Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 16
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < October 15 | October 17 > |
|---|
October 16
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 12:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TheBlogGenerationY.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yoaniedits (notify | contribs).
- This website screenshot can't be released to PD by the blog author because it contains non-negligible pieces of third-part potentially copyrighted work, like a picture by some Luiz Pardo Lazo and the logo of Time's magazine. Also, it cannot be re-tagged as fair use since a free version is now obviously conceivable. Damiens.rf 01:43, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ChandlerCanterburyKnowingPremiere2009.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chandler Bonor (notify | contribs).
- Delete Image source [1] clearly indicates this is a copyright image. ww2censor (talk) 04:34, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I've tagged this image as missing a source and a license.--Rockfang (talk) 20:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 14:07, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Processor Update.pptx (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by tbrisebois (notify | contribs).
- File unintentionally uploaded 128.29.43.3 (talk) 13:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 10:06, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mandarin Oriental Bangkok exterior.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Brandopedia (notify | contribs).
- the image is obsolete. A higher resolution image exists already Brandopedia (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Both this image and the replacement have been tagged as not showing permission.--Rockfang (talk) 20:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bill Clinton at Bæjarins beztu.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Einir Ragnarsson (notify | contribs).
- The fact that Bill Clinton ate at Bæjarins Beztu Pylsur doesn't mean that a non-free image is needed to illustrate the event. A free image of the hot dog stand should suffice, with the in-text description of famous visitors. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, there's no rationale and no way that it could have a correct one. Nyttend (talk) 12:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The album is used in the artist's infobox to illustrate the artist without critical commentary about the album against "solely to illustrate the audio recording in question" from the licensing agreement and against Wikipedia:Non-free content. Also since the artist is still alive, this is a replaceable fair use image. Aspects (talk) 20:53, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Critical commentary has been added on the photo info page, and could be transferred over to the article page if needed. Sf46 (talk) 03:24, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- A fair use image cannot be used in an infobox to represent a living person because there would never be enough critical commentary in the caption to justify its use. Aspects (talk) 22:35, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The album is used in the artist's article to illustrate the band without critical commentary about the album against "solely to illustrate the audio recording in question" from the licensing agreement and against Wikipedia:Non-free content. The image was not used in the article for almost one year but was added back to the article after the image was tagged with a disputed fair use rationale for the article Uruguayan Invasion. Aspects (talk) 21:05, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The album is used in the artist's article to illustrate the band without critical commentary about the album, and in fact no mention of the album whatsoever, against "solely to illustrate the audio recording in question" from the licensing agreement and against Wikipedia:Non-free content. The image was not used in the article for almost one year but was added back to the article after the image was tagged with a disputed fair use rationale for the article Uruguayan Invasion. Aspects (talk) 21:08, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.