Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 November 7
< November 6 | November 8 > |
---|
November 7
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lost Boys The Tribe.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Steven Sloss (notify | contribs).
- OR, fan art, UE Skier Dude ► 04:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE, easily replaced by text Skier Dude ► 05:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lozza6mmear.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pinkdestiny (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE, blurred image Skier Dude ► 05:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Book Cover Headshot hi res.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kperdew (notify | contribs).
- given image name would appear that this is a publicity shot, (c) most likely held by book company/corp. Skier Dude ► 05:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude ► 05:10, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, typesetting blurred Skier Dude ► 05:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Meth workbook & CDs.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cjas (notify | contribs).
- OR, typesetting blurred/illegible & too small to be userful Skier Dude ► 05:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AlSharpton1111.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by RomanHelmet (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE Skier Dude ► 05:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Albumary phixr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WhiteNurseGene567 (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE (no target article or use provided) Skier Dude ► 05:24, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:12, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:City Building in Henderson, Kentucky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jappalang (notify | contribs).
- Not particularly necessary for reader comprehension. One does not have to see a damaged building to understand that buildings were damaged by an earthquake. howcheng {chat} 05:26, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's the only image that I can find for the earthquake, damage pictures help illustrate the event for the reader. I wouldn't just put a picture there for the reason of just having one. ceranthor 01:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The point, however, is that you don't need a non-free photo of a damaged building to understand that buildings were damaged. I can go to Earthquake or Commons:Earthquake and find all sorts of photos that show what buildings that were damaged by earthquakes look like. Do you have any sourced commentary on this photo itself, or was this building depicted here so important and the damage here so iconic that that you absolutely must have the photo in order to understand the points being made in the article? If not, the photo is simply not necessary. howcheng {chat} 18:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I reduced the resolution of the photo (Ceranthor is the original uploader) and reviewed it for its first FAC. Per my opinion there, I believe it qualifies for fair use because it is significant to the subject (an earthquake in Kentucky), and clearly helps readers to understand the extent of the damages compared to words alone. Jappalang (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- FWIW, this is not the only available photo of damage caused by the earthquake. There are several here with no license details. None appear as dramatic as the one we're currently using. -- Avenue (talk) 07:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I believe the picture should stay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.183.184.205 (talk) 21:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Even though the present commercial value of this non-free image may be low, it's still a clear example of what non-free images are not for on Wikipedia: merely illustrative use lacking the transformative component characteristic of legitimate Fair Use. The fact that this nomination has been sitting around for a month after closing time, with a numerical vote count for keep but no administrator willing to either carry out that vote or override it, indicates that the numerical picture here may not reflect true consensus. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:47, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Deleted - it is not clear who the copyright holder is for all of these images - Peripitus (Talk) 02:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Summary states "we" - who is "we"? If it is not the uploader, PD-self would not be appropriate. Skier Dude ► 05:28, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Adding File:Cdsp2.jpg File:Cdsp5.jpg File:Cdsp7.jpg - same uploader, same reason.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude ► 05:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, logo for "fictitious station" - no target article or encyc use Skier Dude ► 05:54, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mooch.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Glowybluething (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE Skier Dude ► 05:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Moore Park Estate.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Abul1987 (notify | contribs).
- OR, easily replaced by text Skier Dude ► 06:00, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude ► 06:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE Skier Dude ► 06:13, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Peabo Bryson.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Theultimatejoeshmo (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE Skier Dude ► 06:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - delete - image does not pass NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 02:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ken jennings name001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sigon (notify | contribs).
- Doesn't add anything to the understanding of Ken Jennings. Just a montage of how he wrote his name on the screen. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:04, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep, does add understanding about Ken Jennings, as specifically addressed in the article about him. Demonstrative of his artistic creativity (drawing, sketching, painting) which was repeatedly brought up in his 75 games and also of his longevity on the show (no other contestant had the opportunity to sign in so many times). Further, given TenPoundHammer's record of deletion nominations, which is increasingly compulsive, this should be a speedy keep. Robert K S (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow. Bad faith much? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, come on, you basically tag everything you can and see what it gets you. This isn't productive. Robert K S (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, the fact that he managed to pull off different signatures every day of his reign is something people have noticed. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:08, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow. Bad faith much? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Some of these are PD-ineligible. Would it be possible to remake this image and exclude some of the fancier signatures? howcheng {chat} 18:53, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you clarify? If you are saying that a person's signature in the style of a Star Trek font means that the signature becomes a copyright-protected artwork with the copyright belonging to the copyright holder of the font, then you're way off base. If you're saying that the signatures all belong to Jeopardy Productions Inc. inasmuch as they are derived from screenshots from the television show, then "exclud[ing] some the fancier signatures" wouldn't change anything. It's a fair use compilation image. Robert K S (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The artwork in the signatures is copyrighted by Ken Jennings, because he did them on the show, although it might be possible that his contract with Jeopardy Productions assigns them the rights. Either way, it's irrelevant: a number of the ones in the montage here are too simple to qualify for copyright protection. If you can eliminate the fancier ones, you can keep the simpler ones and have no copyright issue whatsoever. howcheng {chat} 03:19, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you clarify? If you are saying that a person's signature in the style of a Star Trek font means that the signature becomes a copyright-protected artwork with the copyright belonging to the copyright holder of the font, then you're way off base. If you're saying that the signatures all belong to Jeopardy Productions Inc. inasmuch as they are derived from screenshots from the television show, then "exclud[ing] some the fancier signatures" wouldn't change anything. It's a fair use compilation image. Robert K S (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article on Jennings already contains detailed information about his academic background and other biographical information. This image adds nothing to the article. As stated by another user, it's just a montage of how he wrote his name in a select number of episodes. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, decorative fair use. Stifle (talk) 11:42, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:09, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:A wop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:#File:A wop.jpg listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic StaticShock (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Vomitingtoiletman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Miserlou (notify | contribs).
- Being used to troll. Disgusting. No indication that the subject has indicated consent with his vomiting self appearing on the internet. JFW | T@lk 22:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This picture is awesome, and it is available under a Creative Commons license. At least move it to the Commons. Miserlou (talk) 07:16, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - there is no proof the licence is correct. Flickr currently lists this as a no-derivatives, no commercial use so the image is not free. - Peripitus (Talk) 01:42, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.