Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 November 15
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
November 15
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept Skier Dude (talk) 05:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zerg rush.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Voidvector (notify | contribs).
- Unencyclopedic, doesn't give a good example of concept. 81.155.163.60 (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- KEEP - Specifically mentioned as prime example of video game rush. Would consider replacing if a better example is provided.--Knulclunk (talk) 02:50, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - per Knulclunk. I don't see how this image is unencyclopedic. ZooFari 17:19, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ncaabasketball10cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Icealien33 (notify | contribs).
- We don't need the image to let readers know that Griffin appeared on the cover. The purpose of the image is adequately replaced by text, fails WP:NFCC#1, #8. Mosmof (talk) 05:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - We already have this representing the relevant article, and therefore this is redundant. ZooFari 17:23, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ncaabasketball09cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Icealien33 (notify | contribs).
- Cover image unnecessary to let readers know Love appeared on a video game cover. The image itself is not subject of any discussion or commentary. Mosmof (talk) 05:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There's already this file representing the relevant article, and therefore redundant. ZooFari 17:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No longer used in article with fair use rationale. Current use is without rationale and in a gallery. Mosmof (talk) 05:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is describe in the articles content. InkHeart
06:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is describe in the articles content. InkHeart
- Delete. The screenshot merely decorates the videography. It is not needed for reader understanding of the article as required by WP:NFCC#8. Also there is no critical commentary on the screenshot as required by the {{non-free music video screenshot}} tag. —teb728 t c 09:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Teb. ZooFari 17:27, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not fair use image of a living person, of whom there
is anotherare multiple free pictures already also in the article. LadyofShalott 20:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply] - Delete - If necessary. InkHeart♥ 10:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:20090928 leejunkiThailandPhotobook.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by InkHeart (notify | contribs).
- No contextual significance for the image itself. User's understanding of the article subject is not enhanced by this image. Mosmof (talk) 06:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is describe in the articles content. InkHeart 06:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image is describe in the articles content. InkHeart
- Delete. The article discusses the photobook, but seeing the cover does not significantly increase reader understanding of the article as required by WP:NFCC#8. The article content does not even mention the cover. —teb728 t c 09:52, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The cover does significantly increase reader understanding of the article and the it is described in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.54.47.245 (talk) 15:52, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The image is not in the current version of the article. For reference this is a version that used it. —teb728 t c 11:48, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, article was unnecessarily edited over and will hopefully be reverted back soon. InkHeart♥ 12:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lunetteabovewindow20040506.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AlainV (notify | contribs).
- Redundant to PNG thus orphaned; same license, same uploader and image is in the Public Domain. ZooFari 06:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I hate to say "per nom," but ZooFari covered all the bases on this one. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:16, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Living Death namsangmi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 69dressings (notify | contribs).
- Screencap from a film with no contextual significance. Mosmof (talk) 06:51, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. PC78 (talk) 13:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:I15NBndNofSBCa.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Saltysailor (notify | contribs).
- Low quality, unencyclopedic, use not stated, part of a gallery in userspace - no forseeable use FASTILYsock (TALK) 07:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No encyclopedic use whatsoever. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The picture shows the terrain and mountains as you start the climb northbound on the way to Cajon Pass. I believe it is relevent to the I15 article. If it is deleted I revoke the release of copyright. Saltysailor (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILYsock (TALK) 07:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:4224641493a4817722567l.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JessicaJaymes1993 (notify | contribs).
- Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILYsock (TALK) 07:07, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopedic, orphaned file. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Low quality, orphaned, use not stated FASTILYsock (TALK) 07:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Orphaned file with no stated use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILYsock (TALK) 07:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Rather unencyclopedic, orphaned image. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:42368668 laura bailey300.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mistermark 21 (notify | contribs).
- Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILYsock (TALK) 07:11, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Speedy Deleted - image is a copyvio. Crop of a (c) press image rather than self-made by the uploader - Peripitus (Talk) 13:51, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:42767431 robjones sns270.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Xoxlisa (notify | contribs).
- Low quality, unencyclopedic, orphaned, use not stated FASTILYsock (TALK) 07:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, removing top image (done) and reducing bottom image (tagged {{non-free reduce}}). —teb728 t c 09:19, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CityHall Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Colleen16 (notify | contribs).
- This appears to be a montage of non-free images (thus failing WP:NFCC#3a). The lower image is at the source, but the upper image is unsourced (thus failing WP:NFCC#10a). The image is too large (500 × 1,152 pixels) for a non-free image (thus failing WP:NFCC#3b). —teb728 t c 11:25, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can be shrinked down but everything else is fixed. InkHeart♥ 21:12, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sultan Qahtani photograph and one of injured man.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sherurcij (notify | contribs).
- Non-free press photo of the aftermath of a firefight in which an Al-Qaida terrorist was killed, used in the article about the Al-Qaida member (Zubayr Al-Rimi). Fails NFCC#8, in that it contributes nothing substantial to the understanding of the article – it shows neither the article subject himself, nor anything informative about the firefight; just a few uniformed men apparently carrying away a wounded or dead person. The uploader now claims in a re-worked FU rationale that it "[i]llustrates nature of troops involved in the fight" and the "seriousness of wounds inflicted". But it doesn't. The only concrete piece of information I can gather from this image is that one person among those involved in the rescue work after the firefight (not among those actually involved in it) was wearing a yellow helmet. Information about the troups involved and the results of the fight is neither actually conveyed by the image, nor in need of being conveyed through it – if there's anything important to be said about these things, it can be said on the basis of textual sources; leaving it for the reader to infer from a photograph instead of referencing it to a reliable text source would be both unneccessary and an invitation to "original research". Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have a question for our nominator. Could you please clarify -- are you suggesting there is something wrong with someone trying to improve a fair use justification? Geo Swan (talk) 03:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, of course not. What made you think so? Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It was the wording you chose: "The uploader now claims in a re-worked FU rationale..." Geo Swan (talk) 16:34, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, of course not. What made you think so? Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:53, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have a question for our nominator. Could you please clarify -- are you suggesting there is something wrong with someone trying to improve a fair use justification? Geo Swan (talk) 03:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, seems a tad hypocritical to be saying "this image says nothing at all" and "this image infers OR by telling people thing from an image not from text sources". Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 16:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The image shows almost nothing and certainly nothing that helped me understand the article's topic better. A man in a safety hat, another man behind him and a white shape tells me what ?. Does not significantly add to reader's understanding and fails WP:NFCC#8 - Peripitus (Talk) 21:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:09, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lights Warped09.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Turbowizo (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned; low quality and subject is under-exposed ZooFari 18:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a low-quality, orphaned image. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as low quality. i tried to fix it but it's not worth it. delirious & lost ☯ TALK 13:42, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:16, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. Cool car though. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:43, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. That said, that's one sweet ride... A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Greezed lightnin.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jonrev (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:54, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a low-quality, orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unencyclopedic, orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:59, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a low-quality, orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unencyclopedic, orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:00, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as an unencyclopedic, orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:18, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:03, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a low-quality, orphaned file with no foreseeable future use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:11, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- non-free image that largely duplicates the content in the other one in the same article. Same text (different position), same set and dress and hairstyle but a different pose. As I have done here the simple differences can be adequately described with text alone without significantly impairing reader's understanding of the topic. Image fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 21:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't see how providing a description for the CD+DVD cover is a "non-free equivalent." Please consider the question posed on the WP:NFCC#1 page: "Can this non-free content be replaced by a free version that has the same effect?" A description would not have the same effect. And if you believe this image is contradicting Wikipedia policy, then you've got bigger things to worry about, such as the covers of (Miss)understood, Love Jam, A Best 2, A Complete: All Singles, and even Next Level for that matter. Eugeniu Bmsg 23:10, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You have confused me here. What I mean is that you can remove the image, add some text describing the differences between this and the other image and voila.....the reader understands the topic as well, or at least not significantly worse. There are possibly thousands of images that have this same problem; they just havn't been listed for deletion yet. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep This is what alternate cover art is. Almost all alternate cover art is very similar to the standard. The only one that comes to mind where simply stating the variation is Zeitgeist (The Smashing Pumpkins album) since it is simply tinted a different colour. delirious & lost ☯ TALK 14:07, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Considering the similarity of this non-free image to the other non-free image and the way it's being used, this is being used decoratively, which is prohibited. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:01, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 09:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2polcorpHQ75.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Polskifone (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned; just a number. ZooFari 21:26, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept I re-uploaded the amazon.com version (much different proportions) & updated image page. Skier Dude (talk) 05:38, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sunstrokecd.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MortonFC66 (notify | contribs).
- no official source to verify Alankc (talk) 22:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep in the absence of anything to suggest this image is actually invalid, particularly considering it is shown as the cover on Amazon. Adambro (talk) 23:15, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- the file source is a file sharing/photo album site, not Amazon.
From the info the uploader provided, there is no way to determine or verify it's fair use, or even if it's a valid image. Alan - talk 23:42, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not denying there aren't problems with this image, rather that I don't think the problems that do exist cannot be easily resolved. The source can be changed to Amazon, the image replaced by the copy from there and a fair use rationale provided. If you're not able to do that then you should simply ask the uploader to do so. Adambro (talk) 23:48, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The proximate source is unimportant as the copyright belongs to Edel Music regardless of where this image was taken from. I'd say keep if the image had any sort of rationale....without one it should be deleted, with one it meets the default keep for a single image in a song/cd/album article - Peripitus (Talk) 11:34, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept - Uploaded from live source, FuR was added. Skier Dude (talk) 05:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Littlelionman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MortonFC66 (notify | contribs).
- source link invalid, fails rational Alankc (talk) 23:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unfortunately. Encyclopedic, but lacks a fair-use rationale. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 03:33, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: kept and marked to move to commons. Skier Dude (talk) 05:46, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1385storefront.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nerdelicious (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned; unidentified store ZooFari 23:07, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I can see a use on commons for this image, particularly as its high enough res to chop bits out for other uses. BTW it's a Ritz Camera Centers store, the one in Towncenter Mall, Boca Raton, Florida - Peripitus (Talk) 11:31, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons.--Knulclunk (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons is seconded. delirious & lost ☯ TALK 14:10, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Al right then, move to commons it is. I'll go ahead and make the move and add it to the article Peripitus mentioned. Withdraw. ZooFari 22:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.