Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 May 24

< May 23	May 25 >

May 24

Jiangsu.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: move to Commons.--Aervanath (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jiangsu.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ran (notify | contribs).

The image is based on File:Nanjing China.png whose history shows that the original uploader did not give any information on the license nor the uploader. Samulili (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The file Nanjing China shows attribution as being from Chinese Wikipedia. On Chinese Wikipedia, there exists this image: zh:文件:Js-nanjing.png, which is GFDL licensed. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 07:09, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That file does predate the one on the English Wikipedia so it's very likely the original one. I don't understand Chinese at all, but there may be a problem: Both the GFDL license [1] and the preceding PD claim [2] were not added by the uploader. Samulili (talk) 07:50, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well the editor that added the tag, zh:用户:Wrightbus has a babel-3 rating for language-en. So I guess a question can be left at his/her talk page. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 12:38, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - I've asked him/her now. Samulili (talk) 17:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the path of GFDL seems to be intact. While clarification would certainly help, I think it's pretty obvious that these images have the same legit source. — BQZip01 — ^talk 03:37, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In my opinion, the problem is that the original uploader never claimed that they are the author of the work and never indicated that they want to release the image with GFLDL. Samulili (talk) 06:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not offering an opinion but the image is unused and replaced in the article(s) with the better File:JiangsuMap.png and File:ChinaJiangsuLianyungang.png - Peripitus (Talk) 02:02, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - zh:文件:Js-nanjing.png is the original image with GFDL licensing. This image is appears to be a derivative of it and has GFDL licensing. I feel we should either keep it or move it to the commons. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Hostel chinese poster.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hostel chinese poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Steinninn (notify | contribs).

This should be unofficial and possible illegal poster, because the wording are completely wrong, just like translation machine. DarkRanger (talk) 17:22, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for a completely different reason, cause seriously, what I want to know is, why is it even justified in the article. ViperSnake151 Talk 21:37, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per ViperSnake151. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, but only because the image appears to fail WP:NFCC#8. Stifle (talk) 08:11, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The Winter Album.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 00:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Winter Album.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anarchy 97 (notify | contribs).

file does not load, is blank. Ejfetters (talk) 21:57, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Loads fine for me (XP/firefox3), bit too large for a FU-album. NVO (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This also loads fine for me. Image has encyclopedic value, is not orphaned, and serves its purpose of helping to describe the article which it is in. But like NVO said, it should be reduced in size to comply with fair-use guidelines. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, no problems. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – I have reduced this image by 50%. Good FUR, seems fine. American Eagle (talk) 03:04, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.