Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 31
March 31
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Who-is-barack-obama.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gem718 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, unused image. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 01:18, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fibronectin for wikipedia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spal05 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, no source Skier Dude (talk) 03:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - source not necessary when it is your own work. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 23:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Domain structure of fibronectin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spal05 (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, no source Skier Dude (talk) 03:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep - source not necessary when it is your own work. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 23:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, orphaned and having no encyclopedic use. Stifle (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CSD#F8 The image has been moved to Commons.--Rockfang (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by MacGyverMagic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, no target article/encyc use stated Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by MacGyverMagic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, no target article/encyc use stated Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by MacGyverMagic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, no target article/encyc use stated Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G6 by MacGyverMagic (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:05, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, no target article/encyc use stated Skier Dude (talk) 03:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- orphaned, target article/encyc use not stated Skier Dude (talk) 04:37, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ShahRukhKhan-Profil.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WiseWoman (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, poor quality image Skier Dude (talk) 04:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Viola s01.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fearless Son (notify | contribs).
- This image does not add much significant value to the understanding of the reader. See WP:NFCC in particular criterion 8, and also this is more non-free images than needed criterion 3a. NanohaA'sYuriTalk, My master 05:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and replace poster in article on film. Remove from bios. -Nv8200p talk 01:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In the article about the film, there is already a film poster, so this doesn't add much. In the biographical articles, this is a replaceable non-free image. PhilKnight (talk) 12:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, If needed to choose one I would prefer the cover over the poster as it shows an actual screenshot with the two main stars of the film in a good view. The poster is very schematic/minimalist and IMHO does not represent film well Alex Bakharev (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree: delete the poster and keep the cover (from remove it from the bios). – Quadell (talk) 20:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tejarat Bank Iran.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Iran2 (notify | contribs).
- Based on user's other uploads (mostly deleted), this is likely taken from an unknown third party source. (ESkog)(Talk) 14:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- GFDL presumed. Unused. ViperSnake151 18:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gekraagde Roodstaart 20040627.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Debot (notify | contribs).
- GFDL presumed. Unused. Absent uploader ViperSnake151 18:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons - no reason to doubt the GFDL presumed tag. —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 23:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The original uploader said "My own image". I have moved it to Commons. – Quadell (talk) 20:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Murdershewroteseason3-thecemetryvote.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dalejenkins (notify | contribs).
- The main character is already illustrated in the group shot of the three main characters. This image adds nothing to the article, and is a clear example of overuse. J Milburn (talk) 20:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Lucasbfr (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Micklewood-bridge.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kvetner (notify | contribs).
- orphaned, superseded by similar image File:Micklewood-bridge-x2.svg (removed from 'Speedy delete' - listing here) Skier Dude (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the original, authentic image. It would be appropriate to move both to Commons, where original images and their derivatives are welcome. --Una Smith (talk) 23:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This image has been copied to Commons. --Una Smith (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:08, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Waris Dirie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Middayexpress (notify | contribs).
- As Waris is still alive, it is possible to obtain a free image, invalidating the fair-use claim here (Wikipedia:FUI#Images_2, #12) —Ed 17 (Talk / Contribs) 23:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, it is not possible to find a free image of her. I've searched Wikimedia Commons, Flickr, you name it, and there are literally none to be found. Middayexpress (talk) 23:50, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So make one, delete. ViperSnake151 02:06, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Not everyone is a fulltime photographer, secondly Waris Dirie has become something of a recluse ever since she went 'missing' in Brussels last year, so the opportunity to make one is not there either, so KEEP! --Scoobycentric (talk) 13:19, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.