Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 21

< March 20	March 22 >

March 21

DomoAnimated.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DomoAnimated.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by DopplGanger (notify | contribs).

Copyright Issue DopplGanger (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Elvis7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elvis7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Angjett (notify | contribs).

Original uploader did not put this in the public domain, that tag was added by another user. Regardless, it is a photo of a 3D work of art, and is therefor not free. It is not valid as fair use unless the article is about the statue itself, which it is not. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 04:51, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Elvisat13.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elvisat13.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Angjett (notify | contribs).

Original uploader did not put this in the public domain, that tag was added by another user. Regardless, it is a photo of a 3D work of art, and is therefor not free. It is not valid as fair use unless the article is about the statue itself, which it is not. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 04:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Alkivar Bio Pic1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alkivar Bio Pic1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alkivar (notify | contribs).

Upload by long-retired user, not encyclopedic. MBisanz ^talk 06:55, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Woodthrush79.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Woodthrush79.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jimfbleak (notify | contribs).

higher-res at Commons Papa November (talk) 10:32, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

LyricLabel.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Papa November (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:LyricLabel.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Infrogmation (notify | contribs).

PNG of photographic image. Higher-res JPEG is available at Commons Papa November (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; JPG is not higher res, but PNG version is unused and unneeded duplicate. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

HitOfTheWeekLabel.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Papa November (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HitOfTheWeekLabel.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Infrogmation (notify | contribs).

No publication date stated. Is this definitely PD-US? Papa November (talk) 10:39, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, public domain. As the article notes, label was only in business from 1930 through 1932. Definitely PD-US no mater which of those three years this was printed in. No statement of copyright on U.S. printed material from this era = public domain per U.S. law. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:19, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn nomination: Agreed that image is PD-Pre1978. Moved to Commons, deleted local copy Papa November (talk) 22:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Unwin-sm.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Per the Wikipedia non-free_content guidelines using a book cover to illustrate the article on the person whose photograph is on the cover is an unacceptable use of a copyrighted image. -Nv8200p talk 02:47, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unwin-sm.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lee M (notify | contribs).

Non-free book cover being used to illustrate a person on the cover (i.e. not the book itself) Papa November (talk) 10:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Even when said person is the author? This is just the kind of fiddly distinction that gives me a migraine. But, if it's gotta go... (sigh) Lee M (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  There must be a promotional image somewhere that could be used instead? That would certainly be fair use, given that the subject is dead. Papa November (talk) 09:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

MortonDowney.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Nomination withdrawn. Stifle (talk) 12:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:MortonDowney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Infrogmation (notify | contribs).

Crop of sheet music cover used to illustrate a person rather than the music itself. This may be OK if the image is pre-1923. Alternatively, given that the subject is dead it may be possible to use {{Non-free fair use in}} instead. Papa November (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It was common in the era for a promotional photo noted singers to be printed on covers of sheet music; this photo came from such an example. As no free licensed image of Morton Downey has been located, until/unless one is I don't see a problem. Keep, low-res period photo of the subject of the article labled as fair use; no replacement suggested. -- Infrogmation (talk) 14:13, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK, how about changing the tag to {{Non-free promotional}}? Papa November (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done. I don't know why tag had been changed to "book cover". -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

<- Withdraw nomination: Thanks. I changed it because the {{non-free unsure}} tag is deprecated in favour of more specific tags. Papa November (talk) 09:25, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Cryon 5 new.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cryon 5 new.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Intagli (notify | contribs).

Orphan, image upload was just a test Intagli (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Marco1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marco1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ultrastealth (notify | contribs).

Uploader claims on the image page that he took this photograph, but now states that this is not the fact - others "handed them over to me". There is still no source for these images and no proof that the uploader is the (c) holder of any of them. From my talk page:

"The following pictures were obtained by me from my colleagues (who handed over to me, the copyrights) during the course of my service at the Naval bases in Vishakapatnam,India and Kochi ,India. ( I am certain that some of my colleagues still have copies of these pictures with them and may have uploaded them to different websites.) .I have a vague idea of the dates on which the photographs were taken ( between 1990 and 2000 ) 1)Marcos.jpg 2)Marcos2.jpg" Skier Dude (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Marcos2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcos2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ultrastealth (notify | contribs).

Uploader claims on the image page that he took this photograph, but now states that this is not the fact - others "handed them over to me". There is still no source for these images and no proof that the uploader is the (c) holder of any of them. From my talk page:

"The following pictures were obtained by me from my colleagues (who handed over to me, the copyrights) during the course of my service at the Naval bases in Vishakapatnam,India and Kochi ,India. ( I am certain that some of my colleagues still have copies of these pictures with them and may have uploaded them to different websites.) .I have a vague idea of the dates on which the photographs were taken ( between 1990 and 2000 ) 1)Marcos.jpg 2)Marcos2.jpg" Skier Dude (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Marcos.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcos.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ultrastealth (notify | contribs).

Uploader claims on the image page that he took this photograph, but now states that this is not the fact - others "handed them over to me". There is still no source for these images and no proof that the uploader is the (c) holder of any of them. From my talk page:

"The following pictures were obtained by me from my colleagues (who handed over to me, the copyrights) during the course of my service at the Naval bases in Vishakapatnam,India and Kochi ,India. ( I am certain that some of my colleagues still have copies of these pictures with them and may have uploaded them to different websites.) .I have a vague idea of the dates on which the photographs were taken ( between 1990 and 2000 ) 1)Marcos.jpg 2)Marcos2.jpg" Skier Dude (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Turrican.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turrican.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fairseeder (notify | contribs).

Decorative usage only. Garion96 (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

81988991_7198d280be.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:81988991_7198d280be.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by TheMightyMariner (notify | contribs).

Source image's license is not valid for Wikipedia Rockfang (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ann Coulter wikiworld.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The image is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:11, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ann Coulter wikiworld.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Greg Williams (notify | contribs).

Violates WP:BLP, WP:LIBEL, and the general requirement that pages may not exist solely to disparage their subjects. The basic rules of Wikipedia don't just apply to article space; if this isn't deleted, I would take it as evidence that WikiWorld is apparently immune to the rules of Wikipedia.
And for the record, I don't like Ann Coulter either. But this reflects badly on the Wikipedia project. Chardish (talk) 19:18, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It appears to be a Commons image.--Rockfang (talk) 19:40, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

(1E)-1-npd-1-e.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:(1E)-1-npd-1-e.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Plasmic Physics (notify | contribs).

LQ, OB, superseded by nitropentadecene.png Hellbus (talk) 19:41, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Untouchable (Girls Aloud promo cover).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. -Nv8200p talk 02:50, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Untouchable (Girls Aloud promo cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Electroide (notify | contribs).

Absolutely no sourcing for where this image has come from. "Contact Fascination" is not a valid source. Since we always get fan-made "official covers" for new singles, unless this can be accurately sourced and confirmed by anyone, this image should be removed. ~~ [ジャム]^[t - c] 20:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as likely hoax. If it turns out to be verified, retag as {{PD-text}}. Stifle (talk) 12:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Emmanuelle_Chriqui.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emmanuelle_Chriqui.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Christianster94 (notify | contribs).

Inadequate source. PhilKnight (talk) 21:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.