Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
June 8
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:08, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Air France Flight 447 Empennage removal.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Austi512 (notify | contribs).
- The credits are conflicting. A reliable source, CNN, disputes the WP credits. http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/americas/06/08/brazil.plane.crash/index.html The actual source credited by CNN doesn't appear to be free use, unlike the USAF photos. Please consider this report and act in the proper way. Is it deletion to comply with the WP:NFCC rules???? I wish to follow the legal policy even though I do like the photo. It doesn't seem to meet all 10 criteria. Thank you.User F203 (talk) 19:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Additional information: Looking at the Brazilian website http://www.agenciabrasil.gov.br/, it gives someone else credit. So while this website MAY give away free content, this photo is a credited photo so it is not free. It's just like if I had my own website and gave away free content but had a photo credited to the BBC. That photo would not be free use. User F203 (talk) 19:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- (edit conflict) Note: This image is hosted on Commons, please see Commons:Deletion requests. However I see no reason to delete this image - there is no dispute of the source on the article you link to, rather it is credited to another agency. This image is relatively high resolution and size, it has not been scrapped off another website. Thanks/wangi (talk) 20:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- non-free image used in a "list of" article - having this image does not significantly add to reader's understanding (fails WP:NFCC#8) and I think that as the actor is not in any special costume it is also replaceable with a free alternate of the actor alone (fails WP:NFCC#1) Peripitus (Talk) 23:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Peripitus (Talk) 00:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:King-Parrots-and-a-Rainbow-Lorikeet-at-Mount-Nebo-Queensland-Australia.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Figaro (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, Subject looks very small in the long shot, There is already a varied gallery on Australian King Parrot and Rainbow Lorikeet Jay (talk) 03:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Swanseacitycentre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jonny7003 (notify | contribs).
- Claimed source of www.swansea.co.uk makes claim to copyright of all inclusive material. If, as claimed, this image is allowed for use on Wikipedia, this still fails the first NFC criteria. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC) — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Galang.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pinchofhope (notify | contribs).
- Image fails WP:NFCC#8 as it does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. — Σxplicit 04:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Image adds significant information, showing the tracksuit mentioned in the commentary and, more importantly, the animated graffiti designed by the artist also mentioned in the commentary and an integral part of the video. M.I.A.'s graffiti is mentioned in this and in other articles and is an important facet to much of her early work, criticism and influences. Removing would be detrimental. --Knulclunk (talk) 17:26, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MIA Birdfluvideo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mahogany h00r (notify | contribs).
- Image fails WP:NFCC#8 as it does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. — Σxplicit 04:41, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Replace with a screen shot that is unique to the video and is supported by the commentary. Say, a wide shot showing the Sri Lankan Chennai refugee camp. As an unusual location to shoot a western music video and a central theme of her music, an image like that would add significantly to the reader's understanding--Knulclunk (talk) 17:19, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Additional non-free image in an article with a very similar existing one. No rationale for this additional image - excessive use of non-free content and fails WP:NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 08:15, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MarionRavenwood.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Obriensg1 (notify | contribs).
- unnecessary additional non-free image that achieves only showing what the character looked like in different clothing. As there is an adequate non-free image already in the article this one fails WP:NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 08:17, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PrincessLeia sTheme.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cinemaniac (notify | contribs).
- Purely decorative non-free image with the rationale "Purpose of use - informational" - Fails WP:NFCC#8 as it does not significantly add to reader's understanding Peripitus (Talk) 08:25, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 13:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fails WP:NFCC#8, fair use image serves no purpose in article Thisglad (talk) 08:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - serves the purpose of identification and critical commentary on how the subject was presenting himself in his attempts to build a career as a Hollywood performer; no similar free image is known to exist. Otto4711 (talk) 11:28, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails NFCC#3 (as a picture of the performer) and NFCC#8 (as a depiction of the difference between how the person looked then and now, which is not discussed). In many, many similar cases in the past, we choose not to illustrate a person with a non-free image when a free image is available, unless the image itself is iconic in some way. – Quadell (talk) 18:50, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As a historic image of a pioneer in LGBT civil rights. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 18:00, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete without any sourced critical commentary as to the significance of this particular copyrighted image, failing WP:NFCC#8 & WP:NFCC#1. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:06, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- image that is redundant to File:Terma3.jpg already in the article. No justification for this additional image of basically the same thing - fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 08:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment this photo is a better photo than the other one you listed as an alternate. Why not delete the other one? 70.29.210.130 (talk) 03:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The latter is better cropped and has a more complete rationale for its use. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. File:Terma3.jpg is a better image for the article. LargoLarry (talk) 14:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:Connor, Sarah (TSCC).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jonesy702 (notify | contribs).
.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2009+June+8%5D%5D){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- redundant image to File:SarahConnorSCC.jpg already used in the article. No justification for this additional image of the same character - fails WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 08:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment this photo is a better photo than the other one you listed as an alternate. Why not delete the other one? 70.29.210.130 (talk) 03:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The latter is better cropped, has no watermark, and has a much better rationale for its use than the former. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 04:40, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One image of a person per article is enough. LargoLarry (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.