Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 June 17

< June 16	June 18 >

June 17

Zobel (14) Balanced Bridge T.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zobel (14) Balanced Bridge T.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spinningspark (notify | contribs).

Obsolete file replaced with a vector graphic. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 00:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I note that one of the replacement files on Commons while clearly having been copied from my original artwork is not credited to me in any way or linked to the original file. I oppose deletion while this situation stands. Even linking back from Commons is not good enough if English wiki deletes the original file. This is not the first time I have found myself in this situation, it has even been the case in the past that my work has been moved or copied to Commons (by others) and Commons have subsequently deleted it for not having the right tags, but meanwhile English have also deleted leaving an article I have written suddenly without images. I do not regularly monitor Commons and even if I did I would not get the deletion warnings if it was not me that put the image there, sometimes the first warning something is amiss is the image disappearing from the article. If watchlists are not constantly monitored it may even not be noticed at all since a bot comes round shortly afterwards and removes the redlink. This is the reason that I have tagged all my work for some time with "keep local". If you are not going to honour this request, you should at least make sure that I am properly credited in the new home. Also someone should propose the keep local template for deletion - if its use has no effect, it is pointless having it. SpinningSpark 17:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have left a note at the un-attributing uploader's page. I am sorry, I did not notice the {{KeepLocal}} template on the file and then I request this FfD could be closed per nominator's withdraw. Best regards, The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 21:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As the author of the other potential replacement at Commons File:Zobel (14) Balanced Bridge T.svg, I also support keeping the PNG image; at least until we resolve which of the three versions will be used in Zobel network and enhance the attributions as necessary. I could not have produced my image without the original file and SpinningSpark's valuable assistance. Certes (talk) 09:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Zobel (15) Balanced Zobel half section.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:37, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zobel (15) Balanced Zobel half section.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Spinningspark (notify | contribs).

Obsolete file replaced with a vector graphic. The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 00:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I note that one of the replacement files on Commons while clearly having been copied from my original artwork is not credited to me in any way or linked to the original file. I oppose deletion while this situation stands. Even linking back from Commons is not good enough if English wiki deletes the original file. This is not the first time I have found myself in this situation, it has even been the case in the past that my work has been moved or copied to Commons (by others) and Commons have subsequently deleted it for not having the right tags, but meanwhile English have also deleted leaving an article I have written suddenly without images. I do not regularly monitor Commons and even if I did I would not get the deletion warnings if it was not me that put the image there, sometimes the first warning something is amiss is the image disappearing from the article. If watchlists are not constantly monitored it may even not be noticed at all since a bot comes round shortly afterwards and removes the redlink. This is the reason that I have tagged all my work for some time with "keep local". If you are not going to honour this request, you should at least make sure that I am properly credited in the new home. Also someone should propose the keep local template for deletion - if its use has no effect, it is pointless having it. SpinningSpark 17:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Like the above, I request this FfD is closed per nominator's withdraw. And again, I left a note at the uploader's page. --The New Mikemoral ♪♫ 21:44, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
As the author of the other potential replacement at Commons File:Zobel (15) Balanced Zobel half section.svg, I also support keeping the PNG image; at least until we resolve which of the three versions will be used in Zobel network and enhance the attributions as necessary. I could not have produced my image without the original file and SpinningSpark's valuable assistance. Certes (talk) 09:58, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Unemployedwoman.july08.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unemployedwoman.july08.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pdauwe (notify | contribs).

Free image of supposed "unemployed college grad" - No real policy reason for deletion except for what seems to be a violation of WP:BLP. Really adds little to the article and disparages the subject who has probably not signed a model release and is not identified. Peripitus (Talk) 03:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Freddys dead screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freddys dead screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ucantnot (notify | contribs).

I am not seeing the importance of the appearance of the Dream Demons. This image is not needed, the use of non-free media is not justified. J Milburn (talk) 10:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Like I said about the Freddy vs. Jason photo. Delete until improvements are in place ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 22:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Freddy vs jason promo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freddy vs jason promo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ucantnot (notify | contribs).

Krueger's appearance in this film is not discussed in the article, and this image seems mostly decorative. Also, a poor rationale, and an unilluminating caption. Image seems primarily decorative. J Milburn (talk) 11:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Major improvements and additions to the Freddy Krueger page are going to take place soon. I say the image should be deleted be re-added when the improvements are in place ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 22:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Logo-modia.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Fair use rationale added, in use. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Logo-modia.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rahulaiwa9 (notify | contribs).

Looks like a corporate logo, so possibly unfree. Unused. J Milburn (talk) 15:25, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It has been used to make the wiki entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modia_-_Home_Theater_Store after taking consent from the owners. Rahulaiwa9 (talk) 17:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

DSCN3969 lowellspindlesculpture e.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. Non-free image, copyright tags not updated. Article that it is being used in doesn't contain any amount of critical commentary on sculpture, so fails WP:NFCC anyway. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:44, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN3969 lowellspindlesculpture e.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Decumanus (notify | contribs).

Nice free photo, but the main subject is a copyrighted sculpture, and the U.S. doesn't have Freedom of Panorama for sculptures, sadly. – Quadell ^(talk) 15:33, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about copyright, but the case that the wiki article you linked to was about selling photos of a sculpture the photographer didn't make. Can't this low resolution picture used in the context of describing Lowell National Historical Park be considered fair use? CSZero (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Munze der neuguinea kompanie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Munze der neuguinea kompanie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Auntieruth55 (notify | contribs).

The person who took this photo did not die over 100 years ago, and photos of coins are copyrightable. J Milburn (talk) 16:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSCN4165.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DSCN4165.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nicht eis.

Blurry photo of a girl (possibly underage, maybe not) sticking out her pierced tongue and stretching her nipple. No possible encyclopedic (or prurient) use. Also, bad name and no description. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:56, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Dame Maggie Smith - McGonagall.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:47, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dame Maggie Smith - McGonagall.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Peeperman (notify | contribs).

Not user-created, but a still from a movie – Quadell ^(talk) 19:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.