Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 July 10

< July 9	July 11 >

July 10

File:Finished station.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted by Lenticel (talk · contribs) by author's request. — Σ xplicit 03:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finished station.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by J.reed (notify | contribs).

duplicate of File:BSicon uTurmBHFAo.svg j.reed (talk) 00:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Since you're the author of both images, you can request deletion by adding {{db-g7}} to the image you want deleted. — Σ xplicit 03:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Lenticel ^(talk) 03:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Since this was taken care of, I'll go ahead and close this. — Σ xplicit 03:58, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Csjdmmayor.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Csjdmmayor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ramz Trinidad (notify | contribs).

Derivative work from non free image. Image where subject's portrait is obtained is of unknown copyright status but is probably copyrighted as well. Lenticel ^(talk) 00:37, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arto Alanenpaa 2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arto Alanenpaa 2007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Aadesig (notify | contribs).

Delete Orphaned image associated with deleted article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arto Alanenpää. ww2censor (talk) 01:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Orphaned image that serves no encyclopedic purpose. — Σ xplicit 03:41, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete orphaned and unlicensed.--Lenticel ^(talk) 03:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nancy Reagan at Republican debate January 30, 2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nancy Reagan at Republican debate January 30, 2008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Happyme22 (notify | contribs).

Unjustifiable FU image. It is likely that a free image exists. Even if one does not, this scene is not significant enough to warrant an FU image. It's a picture of her at a debate. Does not significantly increase the reader's understanding of the topic. ÷seresin 04:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously replaceable. Stifle (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Communist California.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Kept - certainly no consensus to delete. - Peripitus (Talk) 06:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Communist California.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Subman758 (notify | contribs).

Unencyclopedic. Being used solely in a userbox that is a questionable political statement. Editor who uploaded has admitted they are selling this photo commercially. No articles link use this image, nor is it likely they ever will. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No encyclopedic value, strictly being used for political reasons. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 09:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep. Many users have single purpose pictures adorning their userpages. Does this hit too close to home for some people who want to censor it? Besides, I bet that flag will be used soon enough.My cat's breath smells like catfood (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have to respectfully disagree with this nomination. There is no problem in employing userboxes to make personal political statements -- last year saw userboxes advocating the Obama and McCain presidential campaigns, for example, and I don't believe any effort was made to have those statements removed. Whether this statement is "questionable" is a matter of opinion; as it stands, policy is not being violated by having it online. Pastor Theo (talk) 10:57, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pastor Theo, what about the statement "I have started selling these as bumper stickers, to protest the unjust taxing of Californian by our Socialist State Government. I started handing them out at the Tax Tea Parties in Orange County, until I was told I should start selling them. I sell them at 4.00 a piece"...is commercial use/advertising of an off-wiki product not a concern? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Besides which, California voted down a bunch of tax requests recently, which doesn't happen in Communist countries. How about if I fly a Nazi flag and call it the Texas state flag? Would that be OK in the eyes of that user? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 13:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it's a long ways from posting support of legitimate political candidates, to posting self-invented stuff for the sole purpose of agitation. Look at the history of User:Axmann8's page for a case study. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 13:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP Bwilkins, and Baseball Bugs obviously have a problem with me. This is the second time in less then 24 hours Bwilkins has tried to delete this. They both obviously suffer from sour grapes. They both tried to block me and delete this photo yesterday and were turned down. It is true, while I now sell this Image, that only started two months ago, while image has been on Wikipedia for well over a year. I also said the original intent for it was to create a userbox. Bwilkins you say I am trying advertise it, then why does the photo only appear on my user page and no where else. Bwilkins I feel the real reason you are nominating this a second time in 24 hours, is so you can bait me into a fight, so I will be blocked. It will not work. I am way more mature then you, and I will not let your sour grapes put me down. If it does get deleted, I won't cry. You won't stop this image from being seen. It is appearing on cars in South Orange County, and soon the entire state. By the Bwilkins the article Tea Party protests may soon see this image, as I was at some of those Tea Parties, and pictures of me were taken, holding a blown up copy of this image.--Subman758 (talk) 13:00, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let's try a little WP:AGF here. I don't play games. I never tried to have you blocked. I originally CSD'd the file, now it's at XfD. That kind of mentality is a little beyond the concept of congenial editing. Answer this: why does this file belong on Wikipedia instead of say ... Photobucket. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why does it bother you so much? It appears on MY user page, not yours.--Subman758 (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You are not allowed to use your page to sell products. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 13:35, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you may wish to read WP:UP ... it's not your userpage. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 13:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, users are entitled to their opinions. Stifle (talk) 15:22, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep even though I think it is silly, there are many many political-centric userboxes and this images inclusion in one (or on his user page) is no more offensive (maybe the wrong word) than any of those. Also I don't see him actually trying to sell the image here (if he is/was that is/was easily fixed without actually deleting the image).--kelapstick (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -- Unlike the photo of mine I caught him stealing on Panoromio, and despite his past history of incivility, this image is harmless --its hardly an offensive view, politics breeds all sorts of silly ideas. I don't think holding amusing views like that necessarily violates Userbox content restrictions. --Bobak (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I'll go ahead and add my illustration of the Texas state flag with the Nazi swastika on it. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 18:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to do so. I don't agree with Nazism, but it is your right to do so. If it is ever nominated for deletion, I will say keep it. What is really sad is that the Swastika is a symbol of good luck. That is until it was hijacked by the Nazi's. In case you misinterpret the meaning of my flag Bugs. I do not support Communism. I merely feel, that if our state government here is going to embrace it so much, why try hide it?--Subman758 (talk) 19:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How does voting down 7 of 8 proposed tax increases qualify as "embracing communism"? Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 19:23, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - In any case, equating the citizens of Texas with Nazis is every bit as absurd and offensive as equating the citizens of California with Commies. It's not appropriate for a user page. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 19:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Well, it's not the citizens of California that are being called commies. It's the government.My cat's breath smells like catfood (talk) 23:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - No, he says here [1] that "it is really the people's fault", and he's got it right. They elect their politicians, and if they don't like it, they can elect someone else - something you can't do in an actual communist country. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots 00:07, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        And he says here [2] that the people have no real say (why he objects to the term "People's Republic of California"). My cat's breath smells like catfood (talk) 02:20, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is ridiculous. This image, along with the userbox it is associated with is the exact reason Wikipedia:User page says:

Polemical statements unrelated to Wikipedia; in particular, statements attacking or vilifying groups of editors or persons are generally considered divisive and removed, and reintroducing them is often considered disruptive.

Userboxes are generally for the purpose of showing an expression so that editors can coordinate contributions to the project and can work together on the topic of the userbox. Userboxes (and the images created for them) used in any other way should be deleted. Obviously the notion that California is a state run by communists is neither brings together editors for the purpose of editing nor does it reflect anything logical.

@Subman758 And this logic coming from yourself, a user who claims to be a United States Navy veteran, is particularly disgraceful. — ℳℴℯ ε 04:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to commons. 70.29.208.69 (talk) 05:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP KEEP KEEP KEEP KEEP I to live in California, and I have to say, sub is right the state government is so far left leaning they migh as well be commies. I love the flag he made, and would love it if it were real.--Opattie (talk) 06:26, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

— Opattie (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

I'm of the impression that we should only host unencyclopedic images for userpages when they're not going to be a problem or reasonably allowed for expression. This is not such an image; Wikipedia should not be hosting images used for political advocacy. ÷seresin 10:12, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP I also, live in California, and I tool feel our State government, is out of control. I usally vote Democratic, however in 2010 I intend on voting Republican across the board. Thanks for the flag. We need a symbol that shows the world just how pissed off we are!!!!!--Bubblehead77 (talk) 17:01, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

— Bubblehead77 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment A quick reading of WP:SOCK might not be a bad idea :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:10, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I must call for a decision. From what I can see the only people whom want this image gone, are BWilkens, BaseballBugs, & MoeE. Either way the Current consensus is 8-3 in favor of Keeping this image, including two admins. I do feel sufficient time has been given to consider this image. However if certain people wish to wait out the entire seven days, fine by me, more time for people to say KEEP--Subman758 (talk) 23:25, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Completely agree. Furthermore, the comparison with the Nazi swastika is off base as a plethora of editors have the hammer and sickle flag on their userpages and are self-proclaimed communists with nary a peep from anyone, whereas a swastika would immediately be removed from a userpage, with the offending user warned/blocked/banned. My cat's breath smells like catfood (talk) 02:18, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is a 7 day process, and !votes by Sockpuppets don't ever count. Besides, AfD is based on arguments, not !votes (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 08:33, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The seven day window is closed!!!--Subman758 (talk) 13:13, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dennis and Linda Daugaard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dennis and Linda Daugaard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tonywiki (notify | contribs).

Web resolution, no meta-data, looks like a publicity shot. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this image. J Milburn (talk) 11:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DebutGalexia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DebutGalexia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WindKun (notify | contribs).

Unused, it is unclear what this actual shows. No forseeable use. J Milburn (talk) 11:44, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's a higher resolution version of File:Album600.gif, which was uploaded by the same user. It's an album cover for an album by Galexia, and appears to have been uploaded by a member of the band. The band's article was deleted so it probably won't be needed. snigbrook (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Myspaceandrew-006631-199x300.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Myspaceandrew-006631-199x300.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cass81 (notify | contribs).

Low resolution, no meta-data. Title suggests it may have been taken from MySpace. J Milburn (talk) 12:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twkssnippet.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Twkssnippet.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cass81 (notify | contribs).

Screenshot of a webpage. Unlikely to be released under those licenses. J Milburn (talk) 12:30, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brand-Site---Chart.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PTCL-subtypes.jpg Roannevista (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I've tagged the image as having no source and no license.--Rockfang (talk) 19:34, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Provided copyright and source, but this picture is a candidate for deletion. Duplicate image at [3] It needs to be deleted anyway. So, please do. Thanks. --Roannevista (talk) 17:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sharon Marko.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sharon Marko.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Reaverdrop (notify | contribs).

State senators are not covered under federal copyright exemption. MBisanz ^talk 22:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Race Bannon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:05, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Race Bannon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scb_steve (notify | contribs).

State police agency is not within federal copyright exemption. MBisanz ^talk 22:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RIPJuan Ortega.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:RIPJuan Ortega.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mcguaffy (notify | contribs).

Resolution and texture of image indicate it is a screen capture and not PD as claimed. MBisanz ^talk 22:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Millerknoxmap.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Millerknoxmap.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Qrc2006 (notify | contribs).

State government works not covered by federal copyright exemption. MBisanz ^talk 23:10, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peter Pitseolak's wife.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Pitseolak's wife.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rbraunwa (notify | contribs).

Canada doesn't have US Federal exemption. MBisanz ^talk 23:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. How is MBisanz's point relevant? The relevant tag appears to be "This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. This applies worldwide." PK T(alk) 14:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Proof, please. Stifle (talk) 13:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - This link says there are no restrictions on use, but the third bullet point on this link says images from that website cannot be modified. I think this would mean the image is not public domain. It may have been wise to take this file to WP:PUF first.--Rockfang (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Peter Pitseolak in the textile shop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Pitseolak in the textile shop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rbraunwa (notify | contribs).

Canada doesn't have US Federal exemption. MBisanz ^talk 23:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. How is MBisanz's point relevant? The relevant tag appears to be "This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. This applies worldwide." PK T(alk) 14:52, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Proof, please. Stifle (talk) 13:43, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - My comment in the above file applies to this one as well.--Rockfang (talk) 19:45, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.