Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 January 22
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < January 21 | January 23 > |
|---|
January 22
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The image runs counter to the information here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/copyright#Images which cannot be "fair use" and the underlying principle of not using material copied from existing encyclopedias and encyclopedia-like works. The image was created and used in such a context where originally published in Aquaman Secret Files & Origins #1 (Dec 1998). J Greb (talk) 02:34, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The Rolling Camel (talk) 09:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep pending a definition of encyclodpedic as applied to a book that contained profiles and stories. Encyclopedic may apply to the single purpose Who's Who titles because they do not contain stories. But all the Secret Files books do, therefore they are not encyclopedias or encyclopedia-like. --Xero (talk) 15:09, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Problem is the Secret Files books are collections of stories and reference material. Taking an image from one of the stories OK under the NFCC, the use here is different that the use in the story. The profile pages though are encyclopedia style content. The art created specifically for them is intended to be used to illustrate a reference piece. That is identical to the purpose the image wil be used for here. That isn't permissible under NFCC. - J Greb (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Our purpose is the same as their purpose, and that's not fair use. ViperSnake151 16:06, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused personal photo of very poor, grainy quality. Absentee uploader (only edits were to upload this and put it into an article one year ago) not notified, as I see no point in creating a user talk page for someone who doesn't have one already and is probably never going to see it. --Icarus (Hi!) 04:56, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The Rolling Camel (talk) 09:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Girl and boy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calvin Ho Jiang Lim (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned UE image. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per nom, not useful.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CalvinHoJiangLim2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Calvin Ho Jiang Lim (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned UE image Ricky81682 (talk) 06:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The Rolling Camel (talk) 09:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oman Home jersey Wiki.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Salalah4life (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete. Unlikely to be used in future on related articles. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:35, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: png image is also available. Van der Hoorn (talk) 15:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oman Home jersey Wiki.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete. Unlikely to be used in future on related articles. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oman Away Jersey Wiki.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 718 Bot (notify | contribs).
- Obsolete. Unlikely to be used in future on related articles. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:36, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Viking1 surface.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tablizer (notify | contribs).
- OB and LQ. This image actually consists of two images. Those images are also available, namely here: File:Viking1mars.jpg and File:Viking 1 Dunes.png. Van der Hoorn (talk) 14:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:No-image-Saxon-Stories.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Prem4eva (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, not useful to project. Mosmof (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Welcome to bobba.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jamsey07 (notify | contribs).
- If it's encyclopedic, it's probably copyrighted somehow. However, I suspect it's just another orphaned unencyclopedic image which has no foreseeable purpose on WP. (ESkog)(Talk) 15:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox test tools.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox quality management.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox test management.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:19, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox test project closure.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sample defect lifecycle.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox test execution.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox test build.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox ftt tree.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox detailed test planning.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox test project preparation details.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stbox detailed process flow.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:21, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Levels types regression.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Black box white box.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mpilaeten (notify | contribs).
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- probably nonfree, but also orphaned by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STBox (ESkog)(Talk) 15:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SharonTateandRomanPolanski.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rossrs (notify | contribs).
- Non-free picture of a couple used just to make the point that they are a couple (fails WP:NFCC#8). The guy is alive but the girl has passed away, but we already have dozen of non-free images of her being used. Damiens.rf 15:26, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree it should be deleted. Although there are not "dozens" of unfree images being used of Sharon Tate, this image fails WP:NFCC#8. Rossrs (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mike Read cloned pic.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bobasonic (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned image, unencyclopedic personal photo, absentee uploader onebravemonkey 16:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - The image may be non-free in which case it falls foul of NFCC#8. The problem with assuming it is PD is that, while we have a physical source, per Damiens.rf there is no information on the copyright holder. Without such information the image cannot be verified as PD. There is not issue with re-uploading it once the copyright holder is identified and its PD status confirmed - Peripitus (Talk) 02:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JennieBrackman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by D_C_McJonathan (notify | contribs).
- NFCC #8 violation. Article does not require an image of this person's portrait being painted in order to understand that such a portrait was indeed created. howcheng {chat} 18:38, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete by howcheng's description and becuase the copyright holder is not identified. --Damiens.rf 19:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - this is the only photograph of Robert Brackman which is used in his info box, and for the film it also portrays the actor that played the painter in the film as well as the subject. Perhaps the tag should be changed to {{PD-US-no notice}} as the photograph was taken in 1948 and has never shown a copyright notice. Doc ♬ talk 12:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's PD, then I have no objection to the photo's use. howcheng {chat} 19:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is this PD talk just speculation or do we have some evidence of this? --Damiens.rf 15:28, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it's PD, then I have no objection to the photo's use. howcheng {chat} 19:30, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AtleeforGov.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Comraderedoctober (notify | contribs).
- Not used (assosiated article is twise deleted), absent (indef blocked) uploader. Sherool (talk) 20:44, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.