Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 1

< January 31	February 2 >

February 1

Trioxane.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trioxane.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CDN99 (notify | contribs).

orphaned, no target article supplied Skier Dude (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or move to Commons 1,3,5-Trioxane already has an image. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 01:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

UN stub 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:UN stub 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yorktown1776 (notify | contribs).

orphaned wikiproject image Skier Dude (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

UN stub.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:UN stub.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yorktown1776 (notify | contribs).

orphaned wikiproject image Skier Dude (talk) 01:01, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Usaoutlinemaprwb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Usaoutlinemaprwb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jengod (notify | contribs).

orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Vcard.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) An image with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vcard.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nickshanks (notify | contribs).

orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:11, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- was for use on my user page. am not using it any more, so delete — Nicholas (reply) @ 08:23, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Venezuelaensignsmall.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Venezuelaensignsmall.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by McMullen (notify | contribs).

orphaned flag image; .svb version available Skier Dude (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

WW1rib.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:WW1rib.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Husnock (notify | contribs).

orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Yellow card.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yellow card.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MANOS (notify | contribs).

orphaned, target article/encyc. use unclear Skier Dude (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Uruguayjacksmall.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uruguayjacksmall.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by McMullen (notify | contribs).

orphaned flag image; high res are available on commons Skier Dude (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Song Chun Yan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Song Chun Yan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pandaquila (notify | contribs).

orphaned, target article probably deleted Vladimir Fomenko - no permission (OTRS) received Skier Dude (talk) 04:17, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Died woman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Died woman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Caiqian (notify | contribs).

Low Quality, Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, and Possible Copyright Violation. - Image suffers poor technical problems, and I assume it is copyright violation, as the source leads to a misleading page. Zoo Fari 05:03, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

STr.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:STr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by [[User talk:User:Acom#File:STr.jpg listed for deletion|User:Acom]] ([{{fullurl:User_talk:User:Acom|action=edit&preload=Template:idw_preload&editintro=Template:idw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/User:Acom|contribs]]).

Orphaned, Low Quality - Does not illustrate anything and lacking summary. Zoo Fari 05:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

OutputleveldBfreq.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy Keep/nom withdrawn (non admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 00:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:OutputleveldBfreq.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leahw86 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, Low quality - Who knows what this image represents; it lacks summary and detail Zoo Fari 05:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But it's linked to Auditory masking and has a caption there explaining what it is. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion Canceled Oops. I might have missed that. Zoo Fari 00:16, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Southeastern_five-lined_skink.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: - Keep - It seems clear that this is not totally PD but as all that they have asked for is attribution I've updated the licence as such - Peripitus (Talk) 11:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southeastern_five-lined_skink.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lupo (notify | contribs).

Not US federal goverment; not public domain. multichill (talk) 16:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~ South Florida Watershed Management District is the source of the image, it appears to be part of the Florida state government, not the federal government. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. That part seems to have been an error of mine. However, the Internet Archive shows that the source site stated in February 2004 and also in June 2004 that visitors were "free to copy/download" the photos, and furthermore "All we ask is that you credit the South Florida Water Management District as the source for images you use on your site or in a publication." I uploaded the image in April 2004, which is in this timespan. Hence keep but but re-tag as {{attribution}}. Lupo 10:51, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  BTW, they still said so in June 2007, shortly before their photo library disappeared in August 2007. It appears that even in June 2007, they were still offering this image (#0798) on their list of hi-res images. The internet archive has it here. Lupo 11:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

okey dokey, keep then. Beeblebrox (talk) 07:22, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Old ATI logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old ATI logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Bun39 (notify | contribs).

Company logo tagged as self-created. Possible copyvio; bringing to FFD because it's supposedly the "former" logo. Not sure if it still qualifies as copyvio or not, but it's not self-created to be sure. GlassCobra 17:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete, copyright violation - just because it's not the current image doesn't mean the rights have vanished. GARDEN 17:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Joinery-slidingdovetail.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joinery-slidingdovetail.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SilentC (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Joinery-slidingdovetail.gif, which removes the colored band from the top of the image. JaGa^talk 17:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Manual transmission clutch GEAR 1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manual transmission clutch GEAR 1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by World arm lamp (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Manual transmission clutch First gear.PNG. JaGa^talk 18:53, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Manual transmission clutch GEAR 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manual transmission clutch GEAR 2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by World arm lamp (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Manual transmission clutch Second gear.PNG. JaGa^talk 18:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Manual transmission clutch GEAR 3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manual transmission clutch GEAR 3.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by World arm lamp (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Manual transmission clutch Third gear.PNG. JaGa^talk 18:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Manual transmission clutch GEAR 4.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manual transmission clutch GEAR 4.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by World arm lamp (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Manual transmission clutch Fourth gear.PNG. JaGa^talk 18:55, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Manual transmission clutch NEUTRAL.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manual transmission clutch NEUTRAL.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by World arm lamp (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Manual transmission clutch Neutral.PNG. JaGa^talk 18:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Manual transmission clutch REVERSE.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manual transmission clutch REVERSE.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by World arm lamp (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, replaced by File:Manual transmission clutch Reverse gear.PNG. JaGa^talk 18:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Bism.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bism.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pashtun Ismailiyya (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, originally intended for Template:Sunni Islam, which now uses a different image. JaGa^talk 19:07, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pointless at this point, I would support the deletion. --♥pashtun ismailiyya 21:40, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

HobbitTwelfthImpLastPage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete Andrew c ^[talk] 16:40, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:HobbitTwelfthImpLastPage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Strebe (notify | contribs).

picture of unfree book text Samuell Lift me up or put me down 19:18, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This image meets all 10 criteria listed as policy at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-free_content. If you believe it violates the Policy, please state which item and how it violates it. Strebe (talk) 07:25, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

But it is not tagged as unfree. Samuell Lift me up or put me down 23:27, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ~~or at a minimum retag~~. Blatantly not free. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:25, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged with rationale. Sorry. I am not disputing that it is unfree. I simply did not know what you were talking about. Something like "Needs 'unfree copyright tag'" would have been helpful. Strebe (talk) 10:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see the utility of the image. A far more descriptive image is File:HobbitTwelfthImpLastPageMeasure.jpg. The image discussed here is superfluous to the purpose of showing measurements of the distances. I've struck my retag comment, and stand with delete. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I and others see the utility. "Superfluous" is hyperbole. It is considerably easier to understand what is going on, and where, in File:HobbitTwelfthImpLastPageMeasure.jpg given the context of File:HobbitTwelfthImpLastPage.jpg, and I have been told this by several people, some of them book dealers who routinely use this resource. There is no violation of fair use here, no chance of a claim being lodged, no one being harmed, and no Wikipedia policy violated or under dispute here other than the subjective merit of the illustration's inclusion. Strebe (talk) 01:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - here we are using a non-free image to demonstrate that a text gap was different between editions. Not only can it be described in (free) text but the small difference between seeing an image of the gap and reading about the gap is not significant for reader's. I just read it with images turned off and the lack did not decrease my understanding in any notable way - Peripitus (Talk) 22:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rendy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rendy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kun7h14n N91n (notify | contribs).

Only being used in soon-to-be-deleted hoax userpage articles. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete" Based on it's use on another Wiki (File:Rendy.jpg) and the description given on the same users talk page (User talk:Khuntien Ngin (User:Kun7h14n N91n) - "About Rendy.jpg Image" - "The most likeable and favorite photo ever in the Rendy's website. Many people say Rendy is so rock and cute on that photo. That's why i picked the photo to Rendy's main photo. Kunthian Ngin 19:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)") I feel reestablishes this as a blatant copyvio and could be deleted as such via CSD F9.[reply]
Update The uploader is apparently a sock, and the image is now orphaned as the hoax page it was on has been deleted. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Rendy 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:55, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rendy 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Khuntien Ngin (notify | contribs).

only being used in soon-to-be-deleted hoax page Beeblebrox (talk) 19:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Also this is a duplicate of File:Rendy2.jpg which was upped by the same user under one of their other accounts. Soundvisions1 (talk) 17:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
update file is now orphaned as the hoax pages it was used on have been deleted. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

0365.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by J Milburn (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:12, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:0365.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ghostexorcist (notify | contribs).

Image is being used to decorate a list of awards the film won. It is not illustrating any specific point in the article and is not required. J Milburn (talk) 21:51, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the uploader. I don't object to the deletion. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 22:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, G7 Speedy delete, now tagged as such. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.