Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 February 13
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
February 13
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: - Delete - just a note - for films we usually allow a poster of the film (which this is noted below to not be) and the image was replete with copyright material from a number of sources (sponsors logos) - Peripitus (Talk) 00:46, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:1010film.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jayantanth (notify | contribs).
- This isn't a poster. It is a website screenshot. ViperSnake151 02:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If it is wrong tag, I change it to screenshoot. Yhat is ok???-Thanks. Jayanta Nath(Talk|Contrb) 07:05, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This is kinda a carte blanche. The page doesn't address this as a website screenshot, but calls it a poster. The page contains no commentary on the website, and only the actual poster could be your best option in there. ViperSnake151 12:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The actual poster of the film is not available from the site. If you think this will hamper wikipedia guideline, you can delete it.-Thanks. Jayanta Nath(Talk|Contrb) 05:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:04, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Rather silly picture, no conceivable encyclopedic use. Apparently never used in an article. Contributor absent 2½ years. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned. Either non-notable art or copyvio. JaGatalk 07:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Appears to be an orphan from a deleted article. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gameheads. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CrazySheep.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Adambozson (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Looks like someone's doodle. I can't imagine any encyclopedic value for this. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 00:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Golf Course in winter.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kamranalam81 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, little encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The photograph is identified as a "golf course in Etobicoke, Toronto", but does not specify which golf course. There may or may not be more than one golf course in Etobicoke, Toronto. The photo does not appear to have ever been used in Wikipedia. It is the sole contribution of the user. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 00:27, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=link}
- File:100 0611 (Small).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mwalcoff (notify | contribs).
.jpg&action=delete){kind=link}
.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:11, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Low-quality picture of a knish. There is a better picture in the knish page. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 00:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Manchild lp.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alarmingpress (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned. Either non-notable art or copyvio. JaGatalk 07:12, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This image was added to the article Nintendo-punk (now redirected to Nintendocore) on January 5, 2007. It was removed from the article on May 15, 2007 with the edit summary "non-fair use image removed, wikified". •••Life of Riley (T–C) 02:04, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, little encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:13, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unidentified and unidentifiable subject. Image description is "picture of a church." •••Life of Riley (T–C) 00:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Thanksgiving 022.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thecelliststarlet (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:14, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This picture has no description, but was added to the article Victoria's Secret on November 23, 2006, with a label "Front of Victoria's Secret inside Tysons Corner Center, VA." The image was removed on February 15, 2007, as a condensation of the article. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 00:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The image appears to be a photograph or scan of two pages of an unidentified Spanish-language magazine. The image description is "Cyber Bagel Limited". No known encyclopedic value. See also this user's other image contribution: File:Insideon.jpg, which is apparently a scan from two other pages of the same magazine. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:DEGIACOMO-EPM-figure-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by De Giacomo Piero (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. Found at Orphaned images in Category:Self-published work. JaGatalk 07:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I have no idea what this is—it looks like someone's scribbling. Can't imagine any encyclopedic value. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:16, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Apparently a temporary drawing. Contributor's edit summary is "made this picture to help describe a tooth problem to somebody working on the dental cavity article, so I could find out a name for the phenemenon and research it, possibly adding any info found to the article if relevant." See also a similar drawing by the same contributor: File:BrenttsTooth3.jpg, which should probably also be deleted. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Flippedout.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LeonMartin (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned, no encyclopedic value. JaGatalk 07:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This is a little unclear. The contributor of this image is LeonMartin. The image description is "Self made. Image of myself, self photographed. I own copyright." This image does not appear to have ever been used in any article. A nearly identical image, but black-and-white and reversed, was added to the article Lisa Zaran on March 9, 2007, and still exists there. The contributor of that image, however, was Lisamarie2, with the description "Lisa Zaran, iphoto, self made picture." So I must conclude that either (1) LeonMartin and Lisamarie2 are the same person, or (2) Somebody is lying. •••Life of Riley (T–C) 01:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WarningMercurySign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tbone55 (notify | contribs).
- image produced by California Department of Health Services, not federal government Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:31, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.