Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 31
< December 30 | January 1 > |
---|
December 31
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 16:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:GardarThorCortes-Luna.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jacklee (notify | contribs).
- It is claimed that this image is not replaceable as it displays a particular event and is not being used simply for identification (see File talk:GardarThorCortes-Luna.jpg for reasoning). There is no significant commentary on this single in the article. It does not appear that the image adds significantly to the reader's understanding. Appears not to meet WP:NFCC#8. Angus McLellan (Talk) 00:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I uploaded this image when I was fairly new to Wikipedia and not particularly familiar with its image policies. I agree that it probably does not meet the non-free content criteria. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 07:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Karen H BW0001.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Des Bois (notify | contribs).
- UE, OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LatexProductionnonwithtxtlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dr. Latex (notify | contribs).
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Manon Dave.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Karolinadawson (notify | contribs).
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:10, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Mathew morris.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mathewscottmorris (notify | contribs).
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Michigan Economic Forum.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Scheemo2000 (notify | contribs).
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Microsoft Word - OldPresentation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Jenniferhjames (notify | contribs).
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Midnightcover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MidnightRunFan (notify | contribs).
- LQ, UE, OR, use not stated, possible CV. FASTILYsock(TALK) 02:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. Fails WP:NFCC #1. -Nv8200p talk 14:55, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kercher Knox house Perugia Italy.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Wikid77 (notify | contribs).
- Two versions previously deleted from Commons (see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Knox_Kercher_house_Perugia_Italy.gif ). Derivative work of http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/46857000/jpg/_46857947_knox_house466x600.jpg . Fair use claimed, but file would be replacable by a genuinely user-created image. FormerIP (talk) 03:00, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Sorry, but I fail to see how this could be replaced with a user-created image. Such an image would most likely be deleted as a copyright violation – which is what happened at Commons. Seems like a valid fair use rationale to me. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The reason given for deltion at commons was that the dimensions appeared to be copied from the BBC image. There is enough information in the PD to create a version of the image independently of the BBC image. It could not be done to exact scale, but there is no indication that the BBC image is to scale either, so the independently-created image would be equally authentic. Since this could be done, there is a workable alternative to using the copyrighted image, so there is no valid fair-use rationale. --FormerIP (talk) 19:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Uploader is presently blocked. If he responds, it should be at his talk page.LeadSongDog come howl 06:42, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the house still exists as do the court documents and other files that describe things shown here. Just as the BBC has taken this information and created a drawing, so could an editor here. Fails WP:NFCC#1 as replaceable with a free alternative that could be created - Peripitus (Talk) 00:15, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sandaldeep Singh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sandaldeep Singh (notify | contribs).
- orphan 115.131.197.105 (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC) ==[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:01, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sandaldeep Singh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Sandaldeep Singh (notify | contribs).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: very poor quality unencyclopaedic image unused in any space. ww2censor (talk) 04:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2008calendar.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mcgintys153 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 05:58, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Missionary bluemale redfemale.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Noraalicia (notify | contribs).
- Low quality file, recently uploaded and shoehorned into a couple articles, wherefrom I've removed it. No possible encyclopedic value whatsoever. — ækTalk 07:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Higher quality image already exists (File:Missionary style.svg). — Bility (talk) 18:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Low-quality, unencyclopedic, and redundant to a different file. Orphaned, I would hope. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Live At The California Jam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rock Soldier (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( image scaled, black border added, text changes) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 08:05, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Zero need for another non-free image depicting an alternate version of subject of the article. — Bility (talk) 18:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#3a. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Canterbury Sound Festival 2001 - Hawkwind.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pauldrach (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( colours changed ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 08:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Zero need for another non-free image depicting an alternate version of subject of the article. — Bility (talk) 18:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#3a. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( colours changed ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 08:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No need for an almost identical non-free image when "with red background" would suffice to accurately describe it (if it's even notable). Unfortunately it looks like {{Extra album cover 2}} is here to stay, so I suspect we'll see more of these in FFD. — Bility (talk) 18:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#3a. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Once beyond hoplessness vinyl.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MajorB (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( part of image used - text changed ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 08:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFCC#3a. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by WereSpielChequers (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:19, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Virtualbox logo.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Koman90 (notify | contribs).
- Proposing for deletion because it is just too low quality to replace the existing PNG version - File:Virtualbox logo.png. You cannot see the Sun logo or VirtualBox logo in enough detail on the sides of the cube as you can in the original PNG file - which itself is perfectly adequate for use in the VirtualBox article and meets all the non-free logo criteria. Biker Biker (talk) 09:17, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; so blurred that it defeats the purpose of SVG images. Stifle (talk) 13:28, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Modify; the immage was vectorized at 64 scnas of color, i can replace it with an SVG at 100 scans to make it higher quality, unfortunately you lose some quality when you convert from raster to svg on such a small scale. --
CompTIA A+ |
Koman90 (Talk), A CompTIA A+ Certified IT Technitian |
- Delete Fails WP:NFCC#7 as orphaned fair-use image. Actually, it's currently on a talk page, where it shouldn't be per WP:NFCC#9. Also, fails WP:NFCC#3a as excessive non-free image use. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, there is NO point in having a .svg file that originated from a .png. If you get the "source" of the PNG in .svg format, then feel free to upload it, but in this case the .png version is much better than a .svg --SF007 (talk) 18:13, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, UE, LQ, use not stated, possible CV. -FASTILY (TALK) 10:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is my picture, why have you deleted it??? I am (almost) sure that I have marked it as a open for the public picture - own creation... --Leca67 (talk) 11:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete No longer orphaned, but still looks unencyclopedic and low-quality. Is there any evidence that this is a "possible copyvio"? A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Characteristics leca.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Leca67 (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 10:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
again... This is my picture, why have you deleted it??? I am (almost) sure that I have marked it as a open for the public picture - own creation... Can you make them available or should I upload a new version??? --Leca67 (talk) 11:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not orphaned. Stifle (talk) 13:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Public-domain image that is no longer orphaned. Not particularly low-quality, nor is it particularly unencyclopedic. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:40, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:You Gotta Go There To Come Back.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Seth Whales (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image of "a cover that wraps around the CD case". Image does not add any significant information for readers and fails WP:NFCC#8 Peripitus (Talk) 15:02, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Circa Now +4 cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by IllaZilla2 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( even the image description says "slightly altered") can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 15:04, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AnberlincitiesSEDVD.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kiac (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( colours reversed ) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 15:05, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CloseCallsWithAWK.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Conditionalsnok (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image whose entire content is contained within the other non-free image in the article. as the content is duplicated this is excessive use and this image fails WP:NFCC#3a Peripitus (Talk) 15:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:18, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kiss Killers Album Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cholmes75 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image that is essentially the same as another one in the same article. The small differences ( the band's logo has been changed) can easily be described with text alone, without significantly impairing reader's understanding. As replaceable with a free alternative this image fails WP:NFCC#1 and is excessive us of non-free content (fails WP:NFCC#3a) Peripitus (Talk) 15:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The_Perfect_Stranger_Film_DVD_Cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Steve03Mills (notify | contribs).
- Entry using this image, The Perfect Stranger (film), has been deleted Steve03Mills (talk) 17:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Veeranpuzha2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Saintthomas (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, same subject as File:Veeran.jpg, which is in use on Veeranpuzha. — Bility (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Upperhack-92206-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 7Train (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, same subject as File:Upperhacklift.jpg, which is in use on Upper Hack Lift. — Bility (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:US Class.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BrendelSignature (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, shouldn't be using an image to convey text – presents unnecessary barrier to editing/referencing. — Bility (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:America Income.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BrendelSignature (notify | contribs).
- Orphan, shouldn't be using an image to convey text – presents unnecessary barrier to editing/referencing. — Bility (talk) 00:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.