Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 December 24
December 24
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BTCA biewers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by BTCA, Inc. (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE, LQ, use not stated, likely CV. -FASTILY (TALK) 01:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Václav Havel on stamp.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fredy.00 (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image of a person on a stamp; already replaced by free images in the article, and the existence of the stamp is completely explicable within text alone. (ESkog)(Talk) 07:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This image it very needed, bneasuce show a interesing of czechoslovak people about his politican.
- Keep him --Fredy.00 (talk) 16:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There is already an image of Havel in the article. How does this image's inclusion meet our non-free content criteria? (ESkog)(Talk) 16:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- But not image of VH on stamp... look, you thing Armageddon was coming and the end of the world, when there remains the file? exaggerating that a bit? --Fredy.00 (talk) 20:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just what you telling - a fanatical devotion to the laws and rules - is the reason why in the U.S. soon, or you can not go to the bathroom without you nefilmovala camera and not the government eavesdropped on Eschelon --Fredy.00 (talk) 20:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Free image exists. That he is on a stam can be written in text and sourced. Rettetast (talk) 18:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Madonna Fever Music Video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Resbusha (notify | contribs).
- Fails WP:NFCC#8 as decorative non-free image of the artist; does not add anything to readers' understanding of the article Stifle (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Again delete every single image that depicts music videos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resbusha (talk • contribs) 14:20, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I would point out the essay WP:ALLORNOTHING suggests that this is considered a poor argument. Stifle (talk) 15:08, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Madonna The Virgin Tour.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Resbusha (notify | contribs).
- Image fails WP:NFCC#8 as it fails to add substantially to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. Stifle (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Then delete every single image that depicts either a concert tour or a music video. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resbusha (talk • contribs) 14:18, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Source for this image is a random website. Could be replaced by an image with a known source and copyright holder such as this. Wouldn't be any freer but would suck less. Angus McLellan (Talk) 16:11, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Photobucket is not a random website but the image could certainly be improved. However, the option listed is not an improve IMO. A nice option might be this one which is a faceshot.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 16:15, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No information about copyright holder. Rettetast (talk) 18:35, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sir alec douglas home 01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fredy.00 (notify | contribs).
- Sourced to someone's personal web space; actual source/copyright holder not acknowledged as is required. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- you dont cant doo dhat yourself? --Fredy.00 (talk) 20:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I have no way of knowing who originally created this image, so I can't do that myself. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:53, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- you dont cant doo dhat yourself? --Fredy.00 (talk) 20:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dc10 j017575.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Namezero111111 (notify | contribs).
- Rationale for this image claims that it is not replaceable as there is "no photo on Wikipedia showing a DC-10 in the MDC livery". This seems a very weak reason to be using a non-free image when Commons has so very many free ones. WP:NFCC#8 requires that the use of this image "would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding". This does not seem to be the case. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:06, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete being used in McDonnell Douglas article with the caption DC-10 prototype in flight, 1970, no discussion about company liveries on the DC-10. Any free image of a DC-10 could be used as illustration in article. Not deemed important enough for DC-10 article. MilborneOne (talk) 22:24, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-free content rationale claims this image of a living person is irreplaceable as it "show[s] the filmmaker engaged in the act of directing as opposed to a posed head shot". But there is nothing in the image itself which shows this. This does not seem to meet all the requirements of Wikipedia:non-free content criteria. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I changed the image and the caption to clarify that she is directing and what she is directing. Pepso2 (talk) 17:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that a non-free image of a living person should be self-explanatory in its content, but perhaps I'm being overly demanding. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:14, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Personal photo of no use to the encyclopedia; not used in any articles. Marasmusine (talk) 19:04, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Vgl canada.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by applecore2009 (notify | contribs).
- OR, OB (replaced with Vgl_kitchener.jpg Applecore2009 (talk) 23:21, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Splitting Adam - On My Own.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by applecore2009 (notify | contribs).
- OR, OB (replaced with Splitting Adam - On My Own_clip.ogg Applecore2009 (talk) 23:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.