Wikipedia:Editor review/Mod mmg

Mod_mmg

Mod_mmg (talk · contribs · count) I don't really know what to say... Mod MMG (User Page) Reply on my talkpage. Do NOT click this link 07:51, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Questions

1. What are your primary contributions to Wikipedia? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?

   I have contributed to wikipedia in many small but meaningful ways that hopefully add up to something great!

3. Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

   There have been a few difficulties with other users, but mostly I was at fault and recognised that and either let it drop or made an attempt at reconciliation.

Optional Questions from Doc Quintana

1. Could you give specific diffs what you mean at 1 and 2?

   I have done so much I don't know where to begin, but it has all been little things, lots of little things.

   Regardless, please look through your diffs and begin to pick a few of those little things if you could. Doc Quintana (talk) 04:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

   If it helps, take a look at how I answered Q2 on my review. Doesn't necessarily have to be diffs, but some sort of linkage is appreciated if there are noteworthy occurrences.
   -Garrett W. {☎ ✍} 05:26, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Reviews

Review by C628:
My immediate impression of you is that you really need to work on more content work. 10% of all edits to the mainspace is an awfully low percentage, and, to be honest, probably isn't going to win you a ton of respect here—the backbone of Wikipedia is writing articles, which you seem to lack. Secondly, and related, I would advise you spend less time making your user and user talk pages look interesting or unique; it seems to be taking up an awful lot of your time—a quick glance through you contributions shows frequent long strings of edits to your user/user talk pages that serve no purpose beyond adding message boxes or other formatting that doesn't really add anything. Beyond that, I can't find anything that immediately jumps out at me as a problem, although using more specific edit summaries might be a good idea some of the time, especially on talk pages or articles. On the up side, I can't find any major cases of you creating drama or being involved in significant disputes, which is always a good thing. So to finish, I'd say just get to work on serious content work, and everything else should come after that. Good luck! C628 (talk) 01:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)