Wikipedia:Editor review/Codelyoko193 2

Codelyoko193 (talk · contribs) I'd like to be reviewed to see how I am doing on Wikipedia and what I can do to become better, and maybe an administrator (a longterm goal). Thanks!, Codelyoko193 (T/C) 14:56, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Hi Codelyoko193. I think you're doing great since your RfA, and I'm delighted that your lack of success there has not put you off. New Page Patrol is a thankless task, but vital. I'd keep up your focus there but also look at WP:AFD. Althoug substantial content addition is important, a good way to show your knowledge of policy is through AfD with comments that add real value - and that doesn't allways mean delete either. For "fun" why not find an AfD candidate article and see if you can save it using WP:N and WP:RS whilst avoiding WP:OR. On balance though you're going great so keep up the hard work! Thanks! Pedro : Chat 21:31, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Well, I always thought that the simplest of edits can help us in large ways. Be it Making two links into one, because the second was a redirect, or adding a stub tag to an article, we can seem like professionals and make out encyclopedia better. The link fix would make is so people would not get confused, and the stub tag would help people locate this article and potentially help in improving and expanding the article. Who knows? It could become featured one day. Also, I have been patrolling the New Pages, and tag an article for speedy deletion whenever necessary.
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
User:Slartibartfast1992 asked me to help in his conflict with User:Keithn. Keithn kept removing our comments and we would put them back because we wanted to help. I will admit that it was childish.