Wikipedia:Editor review/2D

2D

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

2D (talk · contribs) I've been on Wikipedia for several months now and I want to know what other users thinks of my contributions. It'd be nice to receive criticism from other editors. _David ^WS _(contribs) 14:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

Lose the attitude in your reviews. If you are removing something because you think it's an ad, fine. But don't say it isn't factual when it actually is. Or decide its helpful when you have no idea what it does.

Review by User:A Nobody: DavidWS is a nice guy with a good personality! --Happy Thanksgiving! Sincerely, A Nobody^{My talk} 17:43, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Review by User:Sidonuke: He beats me to the good vandalism most of the time. Very good efficiency and hes nice on irc =) --Sidonuke (talk :: contribs) 19:01, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Review by J.delanoy: You've done a heck of a lot of anti-vandal work, and you are a proficient Huggler, making very few, if any, errors with it as far as I can tell. You also make quite a few comments in AFDs, which is also good. Plus, your programming skills have already produced some very nice tools, particularly your bot.

However, around 5/6 of your edits have been made with automated tools. I would recommend getting involved in some other areas of Wikipedia, perhaps watchlisting some of the noticeboards, and commenting if you see some thread where you think you can lend a hand. Also, watching and reading the noticeboards can help you to get an idea of what makes Wikipedia tick, as well as teach you some things about people in general. Getting more involved in article writing would also be good. (...says the guy who made more than 100,000 edits with Huggle... ;-) )

Overall, you are doing a good job, but spreading to other areas that interest you would definitely not hurt. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:59, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Review by Until_It_Sleeps: DavidWS is a very nice person, both on Wiki, and on IRC. He seems to be calm and focused. Very efficient in Huggle, quick. Until It Sleeps 23:20, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

View this user's edit count using Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool

Questions

Of your contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
Yes, I am very happy with my vandal-fighting work. While it may not be article building, I feel that ridding Wikipedia of people trying to destroy the encyclopedia is just as constructive at building articles. I am also proud of my only article above stub class, The Three Doctors (motivational speakers).
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
I occasionally lose my cool when dealing with trolls, and I know I shouldn't do this. I need to become better about controlling anger in those types of situations.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.