Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2021 September 18
This diff needs to be compared with [1],[2][3][4](continues till next page of the book).
This happened even after warnings for copyright violation.[5] Editorkamran (talk) 03:15, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- Throughout this large edit, only a few scattered lines that I missed while analyzing and quickly drafting to fix the article have some overlap with the source. It should be noted that the source was previously being misused to the point that what was written had nothing to do with the source at all when I came across it, and the intent was to show what was actually stated. Regardless, it has been rectified.
- As for the one cordial discussion more than a year ago (not "warnings"), it involved the use of a thesis subsequently published as scholarship, in entirely different circumstances. This was explained and fixed with the admin's patient collaboration, and to try to tie these unrelated cases together is disingenuous, particularly as it is being done in the defense of blatant POV and OR. Sapedder (talk) 05:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nothing to do. MER-C 08:54, 26 September 2021 (UTC)