Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2018 February 12

Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. Examination of diffs going back to 2014 shows our plot section to be written and improved over time by Wikipedia editors. Sample diff; sample diff. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backwardscopy. Attributes Wikipedia. Kuru (talk) 01:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:43, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. Copied from a US government website. Attribution added. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning Cloud (history · last edit · rewrite) from [3][4][5][6][7]. Straight copy paste from one venue to the other but have been unable to determine which came first. Contents have already been rev-deleted but may need restoring pending outcome here. Amortias (T)(C) 15:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to check on the status of this review. In the initial listing several other examples were included from the same site of backwardscopy, interested to hear from a clerk on this. Fiberfile12 (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is clearly a backwardscopy, the other articles which are mirrored (including Epesi and Microsoft Dynamics C5) have been there for substantial amounts of time and in some of them the copied text was developed organically rather than being added in one chunk. That site is clearly some sort of scraper which puts together pages based on other bits of information from around the internet and it isn't surprising their bot copied Wikipedia. The revdeled content amounts to two sentences and I'm not sure there's any benefit to restoring it. Ping User:Amortias as the revdel admin in case there's something I'm missing. Hut 8.5 22:29, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]