Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2015 October 8

8 October 2015

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

• Anim Zemirot (history · last edit · rewrite) Not the whole article, but a large chunk of it from this edit appears to have been copied from this book. --Bachrach44 (talk) 04:58, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. The template was not put on the page, but under the circumstances the content could simply be excised. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 19:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
  

• Roman Legal System (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.academia.edu/5798189/Ankara_Bar_Review, http://www.ankarabarosu.org.tr/siteler/AnkaraBarReview/tekmakale/2013-2/4.pdf. clpo13_(talk) 07:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Article deleted due to copyright concerns. --clpo13_(talk) 09:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  

• Judicial Law-Making and Roman Law (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://www.academia.edu/5798189/Ankara_Bar_Review, http://www.ankarabarosu.org.tr/siteler/AnkaraBarReview/tekmakale/2013-2/4.pdf. clpo13_(talk) 07:39, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Article deleted due to copyright concerns. --clpo13_(talk) 09:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
  

• Felix Manalo (film) (history · last edit · rewrite) from source(s). Unbuttered parsnip (talk) mytime= Thu 17:22, wikitime= 09:22, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Article cleaned by investigator or others. This appears to have been resolved out of process, but resolved. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

• User:Humming Whale/Gladius Blade Bat (history · last edit · rewrite) from https://competition.adesignaward.com/design.php?ID=37593. Brianhe (talk) 16:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

• Copyright concerns remain. Tagged for speedy deletion as G11/G12. It's been listed here for more than a month, too. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

• Susan Pamerleau (history · last edit · rewrite) from http://sheriffsusan.com/about-2/, http://www.uwyo.edu/uwyo/2013/15-1/giving.html, http://www.sanantoniomag.com/SAM/February-2013/Lady-and-the-Law/. Parts copied from at least three different sources; editor has a huge CCI still open. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

The copyright challenge is incorrect. The material is fully documented from the sources used. The material was rewritten: not copied directly from the sources. The material is scrambled. This article is really no different from any other Wikipedia article. All paragraphs will resemble their sources to some extent.Billy Hathorn (talk) 01:27, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Billy Hathorn, I can't agree with you. I've put some examples of what I consider to be unacceptable copying on the talk page of the article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

• Article deleted due to copyright concerns. --Katie^talk 00:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
  There was no way to fix this except to start over. Katie^talk 00:51, 11 December 2015 (UTC)