Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 May 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-05-01 Edit

  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty845 20:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • There is a disagreement about whether they should be merged back together, I have added appropriate attribution in the mean time, so as far as copyvio it should be resolved. Monty845 20:47, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Most of the article text is the poem itself, which is obviously PD, there was one copied sentence that would not be PD, and it has been rephrased. Monty845 21:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Same author, new topic, no need for attribution based on the report, there may be a page somewhere to which the formatting should be attributed, but no evidence here of it. Monty845 21:43, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit]
This is not a copyright violation, the page which you are indicating is copycatted version.JPMEENA (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is a copycatted version of another page, to which we do not hold rights. I am relisting this article and explaining the concerns; the article has been blanked again pending a rewrite. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I note that the user name is the same as the Executive Director listed on the source website. [1]. I left another note urging them to follow the permissions procedure. Bovlb (talk) 00:53, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]