Jump to content

Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 January 9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Suspected copyright violations (CorenSearchBot reports)

SCV for 2012-01-09 Edit

Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
[edit]
Note: Article was speedy deleted as copvio from http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=fzp4V_9HyAwC&pg=PA14&lpg=PA14&dq=%22Empowerment+evaluation+relies+on+the+reciprocal+relationship+between+theories+of+action+and+use%22&source=bl&ots=rwBP Voceditenore (talk) 14:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Further note: It has been recreated for the third time! I've removed one blatant section, but the whole article needs examining. Does it need {{Copyviocore}}? The original author, a Stanford University professor, appears to be copying from his own published works. The article was recreated (twice) by what may be an alternate account. I've left both a note about Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Voceditenore (talk) 18:21, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
DF: Hi - still learning how to navigate and post - so please bear with me. However, I am working with a former student on this and the duplicative phrasing was removed. We are two different people. This is not a sub-account of mine. I apologize if I am not posting this in the right place but I tried to connect to Voceditenore talk but I could not see where to post my message. I hope this works for now. I appreciate your comments and would appreciate any assistance in posting this correctly. Thanks. Profdavidf (talk) 18:42, 9 January 2012 (UTC) (David)[reply]
I'm responding on your talk page and will explain more fully there how to take this forward. Voceditenore (talk) 19:23, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I'm not a clerk. Just realized I shouldn't be adding the review icons (if I've interpreted the instructions correctly?) I am a clerk now. Anyhow, I removed {{copypaste}} once it was cleaned. Article was never blanked with {{Copyvio}}. Voceditenore (talk) 08:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: According to the OTRS clerk, the OTRS received did not establish a credible claim to ownership of any of the above sources. See also Talk:Mobile Payments in India. Voceditenore (talk) 08:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not a copyright violation if you simply look at the page history and it's progression over time, rather, the external website has verbatim copied the text from wikipedia. -Qadri fan (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I'm not a clerk. Just realized I shouldn't be adding the review icons (if I've interpreted the instructions correctly?) I am a clerk now. Anyhow, {{Copyvio}} has been removed by another editor. Voceditenore (talk) 08:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]