Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zidan’s Model of Quantum Computing
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:08, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Zidan’s Model of Quantum Computing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The notability of the method has not been demonstrated, and, in additional, the article has been created by a new single-purpose account. There are four references in the article, all four are articles in the refereed journals, but none of the journals is high-impact, and the totality of the four articles come from two research groups. Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 10:23, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nom, and also because the sources are computer science articles published in physics journals. So, the sources have probably never been reviewed by a specialist of model of computation in Quantum computing. D.Lazard (talk) 10:58, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete At best, this is too soon. The ideas being advertised here were published only this year and have had to date no apparent influence on the wider community of quantum information science. The user who created the article has worked on nothing else; a conflict of interest seems likely. XOR'easter (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.