Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zenfolio (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. clearly promotional in tone and unsalvagable as it is. no objection to a neutral article being written by an uninvolved editor if the sources are there Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Zenfolio

Non-Notable product with references being a newspaper review, a blog and two passing mentions on a hosting service and a page advertising something called Eye-Fi Jezhotwells (talk) 18:44, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page was speedily deleted earlier today. Now re-created with slightly better wording. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I removed some of the marketing fluff, but it still seems to fail on notability. --Transity ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Jonathan Hall (talk) 19:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It looks as though the original author (Vkuznets) might be an employee http://www.linkedin.com/in/vitaliykuznetsov . And the more recent author, sheerdroplet, as well. See http://www.yelp.com/user_details_friends?userid=Wstqm7CETLH0zhbaCAiwow and http://www.linkedin.com/pub/nataly-livshits/6/aa3/a0 . —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.205.131.101 (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.