Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zach Nelson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 19:31, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Zach Nelson

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Mountains of unreliable/promotional coverage, but it seems the only reliable sources are either non-significant blurbs or non-independent interviews. Thus, I don't think he meets GNG. Vahurzpu (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Vahurzpu (talk) 16:17, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:11, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A bunch of interviews in WP:RS/WP:IS constitute WP:SIGCOV. Being interviewed by a RS/IS makes the subject notable. The issue of interviews being primary sources is with respect to factual information. So, can the interviews be cited as sources of facts? No. — Ad Meliora ^Talk∕_Contribs 14:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - CEO of a major software company, he's had some coverage in good sources, not just Forbes. Bearian (talk) 21:33, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 18:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Seems to have plenty written about him in many sources. Oaktree b (talk) 19:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - From what I can tell, he meets GNG. Foxnpichu (talk) 21:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.