Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YouTube Content ID claim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Youtube#Content ID. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:03, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube Content ID claim

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable to have a separate article Sulaimandaud (talk) 17:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lepricavark (talk) 17:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Youtube#Content ID as that is a plausible redirect. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 17:25, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above: the section in Youtube has more info than this standalone article, and even if you can probably find some coverage in the technical press about this, it's not a very significant topic and better treated in the parent article. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:41, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect: to Youtube#Content ID. --Guy Macon (talk) 00:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.