Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YOLO principle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shortly after deleting, I'll be recreating this as a redirect to YOLO (motto), for which it's a likely search term. --BDD (talk) 05:21, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

YOLO principle

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NFT, or more generally per WP:V and WP:N as articulated below. This is an unreferenced substub on a neologism, discussing an apparent software design principle.

Google test for YOLO "only load once" reveals 65 actual results, and "you only load once" gives 85 actual results. None seem reliable, and oddly do not include this article. Many hits for both searches seem to be about using laundry machines. Google Scholar reveals no results, nor does my university library catalog.

It would appear that there has been at least one other attempt to find sources. The only source ever used was a forum thread, which an IP editor removed citing COI (probably meaning SPS). Speedy was declined twice, and PROD was contested by article creator. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 06:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 07:05, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The question is very simple: on 12 September 2012 the Wiki user User_talk:Gnarlycs create the article YOLO principle, and the same day that article is cited on a non notable russian forum by a user that goes by the nickname @gnarlycs; coincidence? of course not. It's a deliberate attempt, by the wikipedian Special:Contributions/Gnarlycs, to use Wiki's content to make a point in an on-line debate. YOLO is an original research by wikipedian Gnarlycs, nothing else; YOLO principle doesn't exist in Computer Science, hence the article should be deleted and wikipedian Gnarlycs reported for vandalism and disruptive behaviours. In this case is hard to assume good faith over user @gnarlycs due to his contributions focused entirely on YOLO. Toffanin (talk) 14:35, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete via Toffanin. Nice research. I looked it over and agree with what you said. $srsrox BlahBlahBlah...$ 20:07, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

delete This would fall under WP:NEO SYSS Mouse (talk) 20:49, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, WP:NOTNEO. Ducknish (talk) 21:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.