Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/X-Series
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 17:59, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- X-Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wikipedia is not free advertising and not a consumer guide. The issue isn't the article as written, but the topic, which is non-notable is usually spammy. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:12, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If deleted, the page should become a redirect to Xseries D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 08:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Obvious adspam. Product does not meet notabilty requirements. Dominus Vobisdu (talk) 11:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cerejota (talk) 04:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Dominus, or at least redirect to Hutchison 3G. Dengero (talk) 12:07, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clear adjunk. Just redirect the page as Dondegroovily stated. ~ Don4of4 [Talk] 04:48, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.