Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wot's... Uh the Deal?
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Merge suggestions don't require deletion to occur. See WP:MERGE. Nominator did not show they researched the article prior to nomination. Mgm|(talk) 09:10, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Wot's... Uh the Deal? (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No substantial content, sources, or notability for an article. Merge/redirect to album. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —BlueSquadronRaven 23:25, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Considering that this song is known under a variation of the title from a later live version by Gilmour as a solo artist, it makes sense to have the article to explain it. Otherwise, we are going to have people trying to "correct" the name frequently in one album article or the other, which is going to be a pain for those of us who monitor the Pink Floyd pages. At present, all Pink Floyd songs have articles, and most of them have enough content to justify their existence. The few that don't, should be improved instead of being deleted. Apparently there is a desire to mass delete, which I feel is unnecessary. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 01:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.