Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Workload automation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Job scheduler. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:17, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Workload automation

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable model being retired along with its associated magic quadrant (whatever that was) https://www.gartner.com/doc/2307915/gartner-retire-magic-quadrant-workload U2fanboi (talk) 11:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 1. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 12:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:MADEUP, WP:OR, and WP:NEO. It is currently completely unsourced. Bearian (talk) 19:36, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:39, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete GScholar appears to produce nothing but accidental juxtapositions of the two words, and when I add the supposed coiner's last name to the mix I'm reduced to a single paper which appears to be about a different topic entirely. Book hits are even worse. Web hits are more interesting, because they are pretty much all press releases from companies proclaiming how wonderful it is that they are in the most desirable quadrant of Govekar's model. I have found exactly nothing which could be used to define this as a term, much less talk about it at any length; it gives the impression of being, of itself, nothing beyond another square for buzzword bingo. Mangoe (talk) 16:04, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Job scheduler, where it is already mentioned. This term is sometimes used as a synonym for a job scheduler and is a plausible search term. The article itself is promotional for a particular use of the term by the Gartner group, but rewriting the article to be more neutral would just end up duplicating much of what is in Job scheduler. --Mark viking (talk) 23:49, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.