Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WordswithMeaning.org

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 19:32, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WordswithMeaning.org

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Non-notable website. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 21:03, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I found no significant coverage and Google News turned up blank. SL93 (talk) 22:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:20, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:21, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I've been accused of Sockpuppetry when I have nothing to do with the site. Furthermore, I believe site is notable, but not under Wikipedia circumstances — Preceding unsigned comment added by Midnight Hands (talk • contribs) 01:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - A checkuser seems to disagree with that statement per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Illumanati_lol. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Definitely notable, especially in Sweden — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.247.180.139 (talk) 04:36, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This IP address is a Tor exit router, and has now been blocked. It may or may not have been used here to evade blocks on two accounts that have edited in connection with this article. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:52, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, simply saying "definitely notable", without explaining why, or offering any evidence, is not very helpful. You may like to read WP:Clearly notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:44, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.