Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfang
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Wolfang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Disputed prod. No evidence of real-world notability, no reliable sources cited. J Milburn (talk) 10:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no significant coverage in reliable sources exists. Blest Withouten Match (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note - The above use is now a blocked sockpuppet. Mathewignash (talk) 08:11, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No notability asserted or cited, reads like a toy catalog. Tarc (talk) 18:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into List of Beast Wars characters as a comic only character. —Farix (t | c) 23:49, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- When dealing with non-notable character articles, it is always preferable to look for a list or to create one to merge the article into, or merge/redirect them to the main article instead of outright deletion and is in keeping with the WP:PRESERVE policy. Only in cases where the character is completely incidental should it be deleted. —Farix (t | c) 18:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete so blazingly non-notable they didn't even bother to put him in the cartoon. No verifiable info, thus nothing to merge. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of Maximals. Mathewignash (talk) 08:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.