Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windrazor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Windrazor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Disputed prod. No evidence of real-world notability, no reliable sources cited. J Milburn (talk) 10:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.
Comment. Note that this article is about a character from the Transformers universe. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 18:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable, no valid sources. A "www.monstersandcritics.com" citation seemed promising for a moment, but this name is not mentioned in the article that I can see. Tarc (talk) 18:18, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable fictional thing for which there are no sources that could establish independent notability for the thing in question aside from the work or works of fiction in inhabits (and that awful blurry picture of the childrens toy made my eyes hurt).Bali ultimate (talk) 19:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into List of Beast Wars characters as a comic only character. The Beast Wars version seems to be the only character with any real plot background, the rest are just toys. —Farix (t | c) 00:09, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- When dealing with non-notable character articles, it is always preferable to look for a list or to create one to merge the article into, or merge/redirect them to the main article instead of outright deletion and is in keeping with the WP:PRESERVE policy. Only in cases where the character is completely incidental should it be deleted. Also, how the page is currently organizes shows the folly of trying to cover more than one character from different series that happen to share the same name. —Farix (t | c) 18:09, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.