Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WindizUpdate (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 00:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- WindizUpdate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Defunct, not notable in any way A:-)Brunuś (talk) 16:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 16:38, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to Admin: A review by an admin familiar with content licensing and attribution might be a good idea. See my !vote below. -- Whpq (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Wow. Not one shred of evidence of notability, no results in a news search other than a single forum post complaining that using the service had messed up his computer. The previous AfD closed with a merge result, somewhat startlingly, since the sole rationale the two Keep/Merge proponents proferred was that they tried it and liked it. Unimproved in years, orphaned, let's just flush this one. Ravenswing 16:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There is no coverage about this initiative that I could find in reliable sources aside from a mention in this Dummies book. The previous AFD resulted in a decision of "merge" to "Microsoft Update". If the material was merged, then we need to be concerned about attribution. But looking at the history, there does not appear to have been any actual merge. And in any case, that article has since been merged/redirected to Windows Update. -- Whpq (talk) 16:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:44, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.