Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikiunity
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Userfied to User:Jeffwang/Wikiunity. Note that userfication isn't a permanent alternative to deletion, but rather a way to offer the editor time to refine the article and address concerns raised here (such as lack of obvious notability). If it sits for a while, and no progress seems imminent, an editor can bring it to Miscellany for Deletion and have the draft deleted in that manner. FYI. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 21:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Wikiunity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, a google search reveals that said subject has not been covered by independent reliable sources as required by the notability guidelines. Alexa rank is not an indication of notability. Netalarmtalk 06:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Moved back to userspace. --J (t) 12:33, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.