Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia

Wikipedia

This page was created in the spirit of April Fools' Day and is not meant to be taken seriously.

Wikipedia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page creates recursion on Wikipedia. As such, it should immediately be deleted.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, april fools. (non-admin closure) --UpEpSilon (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This "wikipedia" thing is an obvious hoax. What fool would believe this nonsense? And what's this "Internet" thing? EvanJM42 (talk) 15:24, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy close as disruption by Vinay412 (talk · contribs), given the lack of any rationale based upon our Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines in the nomination and the edit summary of this edit. (See also this edit and this edit.) Uncle G 10:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

sad if anybody proposes deletion everyone should come and attend. — vinay 10:09, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep and a block on user for WP:POINT. --THF 10:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep Naconkantari e|t||c|m 05:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia

Non-notable vanity page. Possibly internetcruft. - Sikon 05:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.