Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools
 | This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously. |
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep, wrong venue; follow up venue listing discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools as desired. — xaosflux Talk 01:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia:Rules for Fools (edit | [[Talk:Wikipedia:Rules for Fools|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:APRILFOOLS -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 00:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Strong Delete, Fools don't need no rules. Nakon 00:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:Break all rules. Rules were made to be broken. --TL22 (talk) 00:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Merge to *hits random article, and finds one I have no clue what this is* Phin Choonhavan. Wgolf (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.