Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion (3rd nomination)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. April fools nom (non-admin closure) Breawycker (talk to me!) 01:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obviously useless. Fails every notability guideline imaginable. Find more important stuff to do, like file a complaint against an experienced editor at WP:ANNIE and get indeffed within 10 seconds.^{[April Fools!]}--SkyGazer 512 ^{My talk page} 00:06, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nuke and send to Uranus as that is the only sensible option. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 00:37, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wrong venue 58.119.3.26 (talk) 04:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this and consider removing Category: Proposed Deletion while we're at it. Gimubrc (talk) 13:26, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: because we can't let non-admins have a monopoly on relisting ansh 666 20:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 20:00, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.