Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikijob (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikijob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Stumbled upon this one at Special:Random. This was previously listed at AfD and there was no consensus to delete. The article was created for promotional purposes; that much is clear. It relies on paid content for some of its sources, thereby managing to squeak by in 2008. See [1] for instance. Also note that the site is on Wikipedia's spam blacklist. —Guanaco 03:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  04:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  04:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  04:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete "WikiJob features several of the FTSE100 and Times Top 100 graduate recruiters, including Deustche Bank, Citigroup, Accenture, Deloitte, KPMG,PwC, Linklaters, Freshfields, Credit Suisse, Barclays and the Financial Services Authority (FSA)"
there you go promotional article Sulaimandaud (talk) 05:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:36, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 01:56, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.