Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiivolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 00:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wiivolution

The most reliable source the article cites is a youtube video, Google doesn't give anything better, and this seems like pure crystalballing anyway. (|-- UlTiMuS 08:40, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is clearly speculation, as the the very flimsy sources make clear. No solid information is involved, at all. Further, the title of the article is even more speculative. Even if the article survives this AFD, the name needs to be changed to something more generic such as "Wii, second generation". Tim Ross (talk) 11:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect The news article (not the YouTube video) makes a reliable claim that the Wii will be followed up by Wii HD which deserves mention in the main Wii article. If this particular title is an issue move it to Wii HD prior to the merge. (Wii HD currently redirects to this article, but since the article says "more rarely" and since it is based on a youtube video by a non-reliable individual, this is a violation of naming policy) - Mgm|^(talk) 11:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as WP:CRYSTAL. I don't even think there is salvage value in merging. Usrnme h8er (talk) 14:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL there is nothing to be salvaged here. JBsupreme (talk) 15:37, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I thought I'd seen the worst of crystalballery when an article was created for the sixth Harry Potter movie in 2006, but this takes the cake. Hermione1980 16:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article appears to be pure speculation with no verifiable or valuable information. Nathan Orth (talk) 23:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:CRYSTAL, a bit too premature, based only on rumors. This thing about the next Wii having HD should be added first to Wii#Hardware, and the article created when a reliable source gives an official name, even if it's only the development codename. --Enric Naval (talk) 01:54, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete (G3) Blantant hoax. I mean "It will have HD, which means you do not need a Wiimote" makes no logical sense whatsoever. Yes there is a "news story" link on the page, but it's purely speculatory and is not a reliable source. The history reveals a lot of other crap that was removed from the article, including flip-flopping of names. --.:Alex :. 15:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.