Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wi-Fi First
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 12:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Wi-Fi First (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability and a lack of WP:RS. It's a Fox! (Talk to me?) 23:07, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Of the two sources quoted in the article, the Scratch site does not use the term "wifi first" that I could find, and the Lowenstein article only gives it a passing mention. I tried searching for the term, but found no hits for "wifi first" as an identifiable concept, except for the Lowenstein article. The topic appears to fail notability guidelines WP:GNG, but I am happy to be convinced otherwise if others have better success at finding reliable sources. --Mark viking (talk) 17:52, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No significant coverage. It is essentially a network type preference order, and I honestly don't see how this is ever going to be more than an extended diciotnary definition. -- Whpq (talk) 14:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete After some search on Google News and other places, I have found that no coverage exists, in depth, to prove that this topic is notable. — ΛΧΣ21 01:32, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.