Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where the gravity is born
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:28, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Where the gravity is born (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Original research, barely comprehensible fringe physics. Note that most of the "content" cites only a book by multiply-banned sockpuppeteer W. Guglinski. Bm gub (talk) 18:29, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. The formatting also smacks of Guglinski, as does the rather poor English. AnturiaethwrTalk 18:46, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete not an article. Also, if he's a sockpuppet of said user, the creator needs to be indef blocked. JuJube (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Spell4yr (talk) 19:06, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:OR. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 19:40, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Seems to be original research. « Milk's Favorite Cøøkie 19:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and verging on WP:CB ukexpat (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - very obvious OR --T-rex 02:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Wrong title. Origins of gravity are discussed in gravitation and Alternatives_to_general_relativity; this theory does not proclaim to be a theory entitled "where the gravity is born" so it would need to be moved appropriately - to something like "Quantum Ring Theory, Aether Theory, and Repulsive Gravity". Oh - and deleted: WP:OR, WP:PN, and possibly WP:HOAX seem relevant. Coanda-1910 (talk) 10:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:46, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.