Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webjay (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Webjay

Non-notable website, with no significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. It's defunct so it doesn't really have a chance of becoming notable. The only claim to fame is that it was bought by Yahoo. Luckily we already have a Yahoo! article. Delete and redirect (in that order).

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~ JohnnyMrNinja 11:00, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not just known for being bought by Yahoo, the "XSPF playlist format evolved from Webjay" is significant too. It can be cut down a bit though. The copyrights section is stating the obvious... - Mgm|^(talk) 11:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It's not a bad article, and should be retained just for historical reference. TopGearFreak ^Talk 12:58, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. Article is informative and much of it is sourced. The info on XSPF is interesting, but needs to be cut out if there are no good sources. --Macrowiz (talk) 20:07, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This website was discussed pretty in-depth by The New York Times. It was also name-dropped in the NYT (twice) and Infoworld.com. All of these were before the Yahoo deal. Themfromspace (talk) 20:12, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.