Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web 1.0 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 00:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Web 1.0

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article is mostly uncited and what is cited has nothing to do with "web 1.0" Rileychilds (talk) 23:48, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - here is my reasons for nominating for deletion

-Much of the article appears to be original research

-Much of the article is NOT cited or citations are off topic

The article was earlier nominated for deletion and the result was keep, but this article is not up to Wikipedia standards at all Rileychilds (talk) 00:03, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, quite notable subject, educational and encyclopedic topic, has received lots of significant discussion from secondary sources. Also, WP:NOTFORCLEANUP. — Cirt (talk) 17:57, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, page needs work but I'm confident that it's a notable topic (and the existing references also suffice to show that). The alternative would be merge into Web 2.0 with a redirect if it can be demonstrated that "Web 1.0" didn't emerge as a concept except in contrast to "Web 2.0" ... and if the concept of "Web 1.0" itself proves undefinable except as the predecessor to 2.0. groupuscule (talk) 03:44, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and delete to World Wide Web. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep "not up to WP standards" is a reason for improvement, not deletion DGG ( talk ) 07:43, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.