Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WebIntelligence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WebIntelligence

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no coverage of this term in multiple searches. SL93 (talk) 02:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →TSU ^tp* 15:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Like nom, I was unable to find any coverage of this term in reliable sources. More importantly, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. None but shining hours (talk) 13:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I was also unable to find any references to the term in reliable sources. It seems to be nothing more than a neologism, and one that never caught on in the last seven years, from the look of it. Rorshacma (talk) 17:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.