Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warchant.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:52, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Warchant.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional, linkfarm, non-notable... let me count the reasons this really doesn't seem to merit an article. PROD'ed and then restored per challenge from author, but I just don't see how this does or can meet inclusion criteria: if it were cleaned up of all the promotional material, there would be nothing left. Jclemens (talk) 18:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular T · C 18:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. —Jujutacular T · C 18:50, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As written, almost G11able in my mind. There's potentially an article in this, but this isn't it. Blueboy96 22:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.