Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WarP
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 11:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WarP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No coverage by reliable third-party sources. Additionally scope of activities is not international or even national in scale thus failing WP:CLUB. The article is filled with unencyclopedic, non-verifiable, that when removed would leave absolutely nothing in the article.
(The sources in the article, btw, are not reliable, and winning interschool events does not satisfy notability guidelines) Aditya Ex Machina 14:32, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the sources are as reliable as most others, though it may not satisfy notability guidelines.--Karmanyaaggarwal (talk) 15:02, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All the sources fall under WP:SELFPUBLISH (as they have absolutely no editorial oversight, alternatively you might want to read up on WP:RS). Additionally they're all trivial mentions, with no third-party coverage. Since I see you're new to Wikipedia, I've left a bunch of useful links on your talk page that you might want to check out. Aditya Ex Machina 15:23, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Polarpanda (talk) 18:47, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 22:19, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.