Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WP:Rules

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:IAR. (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 23:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC) (non-admin closure) -KAP03 (^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 23:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Rules

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:IAR has, for a long time, been the highest standard of conduct on the English Wikipedia. As such, all other policies have become obsolete anyway. Let's get rid of the pointless bureaucracy TOGETHER! I am also nominating:

adding more laterr Opal|zukor^(discuss) 05:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural close. but if this was in MfD, Keep as this also implies the deletion of WP:Ignore All Rules, the basis for this deletion. but without IAR, there would be no basis to delete these articles, paradoxically meaning all of them should have remained. 💜 melecie talk - 05:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.