Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WIZ-DOS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WIZ-DOS

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor, non-notable element in an SF/fantasy series. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:51, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. As per WP:FICT and WP:PLOT, plot elements of fictional works ought to have real-worls contenxt and impact. i see none here. WP:N requires coverage in relaible independant sources. i see nothing but primary sources, trivial mentions in fora and wikis and wikipedia mirrors -- these are not reliable sources, and even if they were, they do no more than summarize the primary sources (the books) -- there is no analysis at all. Some of this content could be merged into Rick Cook if desired, and I wouldn't object to leaving a redirect. DES ^(talk) 16:04, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 22:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I've searched and all I can find is mentions of it in universe, and none of those show any real-world notability or impact. This would be a great article for a Rick Cook or Wizardry wiki, but real-world notability doesn't seem to be there. Given that this is a relatively modern series (we're not talking 19th century here), if there were real-world notability it should be easy to find something online. --NellieBly (talk) 02:29, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect to Rick Cook. Uncited, non-notable trivia. --EEMIV (talk) 20:51, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.