Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WCC-FM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Number 5 7 19:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WCC-FM

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no evidence of WP:SIGCOV about this radio station. It was moved over from draft space without following WP:AfC. Apart from its own website, I can't find any in-depth coverage and the article creator has a clear WP:COI. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Article is a hoax. There is no such station. Creator is an LTA vandal of radio station articles, using multiple accounts and IP addresses to add content about fictional radio stations.--Tdl1060 (talk) 10:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

but can we talk about it DJ JAYLON (talk) 10:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, sure, please can you start by posting some sources to prove that this radio station exists? After that, we can have a look at its notability. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete: Agree with Tdl1060. I have taken the extra step of requesting the article be deleted per CSD G3 and I have started an ANI thread regarding the editor here. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 14:21 on February 6, 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete As per nom, there are no sources to pass WP:SIGCOV. Pilean (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as untrue self-promotional nonsense. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 16:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.